Is harmony still in the local socialist officials’ hearts

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to assess if the core value of Chinese traditional culture (harmony) still remains in managers' hearts, and what factors influence this core value's persistence. This was done by assessing the harmonious competencies of China's county and department-level officials based on the competing values framework. Design/methodology/approach -A survey of 1,000 county and department-level officials was taken at random based on the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security's public sector employee listings. An empirical assessment was made and a hierarchical linear regression approach was used. Findings -Though Chinese traditional culture has been blended with communist ideology and Western practices in government administration, the core value of Chinese bureaucracy still remains that which is carried in officials' minds. In general, public officials possess a satisfactory level of harmonious competency. The regression results showed that some factors influence harmonious competency significantly, which disproves the view that harmonious competency might be merely engendered in officials by being born and growing up in Chinese traditional culture. Originality/value -Given the assumption that a Chinese-born citizen could inherit the core value of its traditional culture is commonplace, the paper reveals that because the current Chinese culture is a mix of socialist thinking, traditional culture and Western practices, it cannot be assumed any more that the core value of Chinese culture is inherited automatically. On the contrary, it could be promoted by changing or cultivating certain factors in workplaces.

What Factors of the Applicants are Influencing the Performance of Research Science Education? A Back-chaining Evaluation Based on the Data of China National Science Foundation

“…The age groups divided in this paper are based on the age at which the applicants started a project. For applicants who have run multiple projects (Shang & Yu, 2013;Shang, Jin & Liu, 2016), we use person-time method to classify them into the age group that corresponds to the project.…”