2015
DOI: 10.1111/japp.12106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Having Pets Morally Permissible?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aspect of freedom makes it clear that the demands by at least radical animal right activists go beyond a change of our diet; they also include the abolishment of keeping pets. In her analysis of the moral justification for keeping pets, Du Toit (2016) dismissed the “freedom objection”; the concept of liberty is strongly intertwined with the concept of one individual “possessing” another, which, as Francione (2020) noted, was the core objection to keeping pets.…”
Section: A Systematic Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aspect of freedom makes it clear that the demands by at least radical animal right activists go beyond a change of our diet; they also include the abolishment of keeping pets. In her analysis of the moral justification for keeping pets, Du Toit (2016) dismissed the “freedom objection”; the concept of liberty is strongly intertwined with the concept of one individual “possessing” another, which, as Francione (2020) noted, was the core objection to keeping pets.…”
Section: A Systematic Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I remain silent on whether it’s permissible to own animals as pets in the real world. For a discussion of these ideas see, e.g., Francione and Charlton ( 2016 ) and du Toit ( 2016 ). If it turned out to be impermissible, then owning animals would constitute abuse, and real-world remedies suggested here would apply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%