2016
DOI: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Healing of Fractures Regulated Centrally?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rapid positive response in the "Responders" (90%) was observed as early as four to five days after the first injection and this percentage coincide with that of Khallaf et al's study which use PRP. [7] This suggests that PRF requires several days for its positive effects to occur and that can be explained by spontaneous clotting of liquid PRF (± 15 min), which preserves cells and growth factors in the articular space for a prolonged release [8] which coincides with albilia et al study who use i-PRF, however, responders in his study were 69% and this may be due to larger sample size. The slow release of growth factors from solid PRF matrices was demonstrated in vitro previously [9] There was a statistically significant difference between the repeated measures of pain score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A rapid positive response in the "Responders" (90%) was observed as early as four to five days after the first injection and this percentage coincide with that of Khallaf et al's study which use PRP. [7] This suggests that PRF requires several days for its positive effects to occur and that can be explained by spontaneous clotting of liquid PRF (± 15 min), which preserves cells and growth factors in the articular space for a prolonged release [8] which coincides with albilia et al study who use i-PRF, however, responders in his study were 69% and this may be due to larger sample size. The slow release of growth factors from solid PRF matrices was demonstrated in vitro previously [9] There was a statistically significant difference between the repeated measures of pain score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%