Splenectomy represents the first choice for treatment of spontaneous splenic rupture, abscesses, cysts, tumours, and an alternative for control of hereditary, autoimmune, and myeloproliferative disorders. However, its relative indications have been reviewed for better understanding of both the primary affections and of splenectomy per se, particularly with regard to the immune system. The emergence of minimally invasive surgery, the possibility of splenic preservation, and availability of biological therapy has shown that the procedure has often been referred to as salvage therapy upon failure of other therapeutic propositions. On the other hand, patients have their general health status compromised by the underlying disease, by the use corticosteroids or biologic therapy, immunosuppressed, coagulation disorders, which contribute to the incidence of postoperative complications, such as infections, bleeding and venous thrombosis. Therefore, this scenario favours higher morbidity and mortality rates than those of other intra-abdominal surgical procedures. Thus, this review has the primary and comprehensive objective of purpose the best moment for splenectomy, when surgeons can interfere in the natural course of the disease increasing patients' quality of life and survival. In short, it is desired that the surgeon has complete knowledge of the profound physiological changes imposed on the host. In addition, to distinguish when it is curative and mandatory from when it must be put on hold due to other non-operative treatments with similar outcomes and, lastly, when it is not recommended for not aggregating survival.
Key Words Splenectomy, splenomegaly, laparoscopyWhat this review adds:
What is known about this subject?The indication of splenectomy in trauma patients is wellestablished; however in non-traumatic diseases it is much more controversial and current review and recommendations is scarce.
What new information is offered in this review?This review explores the absolute and relative indications for splenectomy in different clinical sets. It also discourses on pathophysiological changes in an already compromised host.
What are the implications for research, policy, or practice?Comprehensive review on the role of splenectomy in different non-traumatic settings, especially, haematological diseases in which it represents a rescue therapy because news biologic therapies.