Is Hierarchical Governance in Decline? Evidence from Empirical Research

Abstract

The growing acceptance of ''governance'' as an organizing concept for public management reform reflects a widespread, though not universal, belief that the focus of administrative practice is shifting from hierarchical government toward greater reliance on horizontal, hybridized, and associational forms of governance. Recent arguments to this effect, however, make limited recourse to the body of empirical evidence that might shed light on the actual extent of this transformation. In this article we report on our review of over eight hundred individual research studies in order to assess what we know about governance based on available empirical evidence across a range of disciplines and substantive fields. We find that hierarchical investigations of the nature and consequences of governmental action predominate in the literature. We supplement this primary finding with additional analyses of research on performance and on public management. We then discuss possible reasons for the observed hierarchical orientation of research. While we cannot rule out the possibility that our findings reflect researchers' biases rather than actual governance, we infer that the shifts away from hierarchical government toward horizontal governing reflect instead a gradual addition of new administrative forms that facilitate governance within a system of constitutional authority that is necessarily hierarchical. In conclusion, we propose additional research that might confirm or refute this inference and that could fill the gaps of our understanding of public governance.

Bringing Governments Back in: Governance and Governing in Comparative Policy Analysis

“…The question is: in what way is the new way of governing societies -"new governance", meaning the development of market and network forms of interactions -eclipsing the old governance model? Is "government" -meaning the hierarchical governance framework -really losing its central role in the policy-making process, to be replaced by a more decentralized, self-governance model (Hill and Lynn 2005;Joardan et al 2005)?…”

Disentangling Scale Approaches in Governance Research: Comparing Monocentric, Multilevel, and Adaptive Governance

“…It does so by setting the agenda of societal problems and deciding upon policy goals and means, and by top-down implementation of its policies. Most new governance perspectives have been developed largely as a critique of this monocentric governance, also referred to as the government perspective (Rhodes 1997), hierarchical governance (Hill and Lynn 2004), command and control systems of governance (Kooiman 1993), or the classical modernist approach of governance (Hajer and Wagenaar 2003). In spite of these critiques, the monocentric approach still dominates many governance practices.…”

Governing spaces: a multi-sited ethnography of governing welfare reform at close range and at a distance

“…While some claim that government has given way to governance (Rhodes 2007;Kooiman 2003), others argue that government (including local government) remains a source of power, authority and legitimacy (Hill and Lynn 2005;Davies 2014). Analytically, I adopt Newman's premise that the role of government persists and relates to neoliberalism in ways that are not straightforwardly predictable, linear or rational (Newman 2014).…”