2010
DOI: 10.1108/09513551011069040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is higher education in the UK becoming more competitive?

Abstract: PurposeThe aim of this paper is to consider the extent to which recent changes in the UK's higher education sector are likely to (a) increase the level of competition and (b) change the behaviour of UK higher education institutions Design The paper draws on a conceptual framework developed to understand competitive conditions and behaviours in order to provide an analytical device to guide the narrative of the paper. The paper draws on a number of national and international sources. Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased competition in the UK education market has been seen as the key driver of higher education marketisation across the world (Maringe, 2005a(Maringe, , 2010. However, even though universities are forced in some senses to become more independent, at present the most influential market is state-regulated (Henkel, 1997;Adcroft, Teckman & Willis, 2010). In addition, the emergence of branding in higher education also seems to be a consequence of system level policies in the higher education sector (Stensaker, 2005), where the government supplies the organisation with critical resources (contributions) and in exchange the government expects its interests to be satisfied (Hill & Jones, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increased competition in the UK education market has been seen as the key driver of higher education marketisation across the world (Maringe, 2005a(Maringe, , 2010. However, even though universities are forced in some senses to become more independent, at present the most influential market is state-regulated (Henkel, 1997;Adcroft, Teckman & Willis, 2010). In addition, the emergence of branding in higher education also seems to be a consequence of system level policies in the higher education sector (Stensaker, 2005), where the government supplies the organisation with critical resources (contributions) and in exchange the government expects its interests to be satisfied (Hill & Jones, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the emergence of branding in higher education also seems to be a consequence of system level policies in the higher education sector (Stensaker, 2005), where the government supplies the organisation with critical resources (contributions) and in exchange the government expects its interests to be satisfied (Hill & Jones, 1992). The influence of government is felt more strongly by colleges and universities than by business and industry (Karol & Ginsburg, 1980;Adcroft et al, 2010). Governments control universities through legislation, administrative regulations (Gledhill, 1996), court decisions and the actions of the executive branch of government.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With higher fee levels for UK undergraduates from 2012 (BIS, 2011), increasing competition (Adcroft et al, 2010) and universities ever more reliant on brand and reputation to attract income, developing a trusting relationship with students which can be leveraged to the organization's benefit during a crisis could be a point of significant competitive advantage for a university. At present, the evidence suggests that universities have not effectively engaged with this potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of the changes, building strong ties with students has become one of the central functions of HEIs (Adcroft, Teckman and Willis 2010), and is seen as an outcome that leads to several advantages, most notably enhancing student satisfaction (JyhShen and Droge, 2006) and ultimately increasing student retention (see Ghosh, Whipple and Bryan 2001). A good relationship with students can mean that they become a HEI's most powerful advocates as to why future students should study at a particular HEI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%