2002
DOI: 10.1198/00031300265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Human Height Bimodal?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last fit, with w = 0.20, detected two components (in addition to a peak related to short GRBs) of approximately the same height and comparable standard deviations in a region of long GRBs. For these last two fits, the dispersion of a corresponding peak of a two-Gaussian is greater than the dispersion of both the components in the three-Gaussian, hence it gives a hint toward the bimodality of the GRBs (Schilling et al 2002). This is in agreement with a very high probability that the third group in a three-component model is a statistical fluctuation.…”
Section: Standard Normal Distributionssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The last fit, with w = 0.20, detected two components (in addition to a peak related to short GRBs) of approximately the same height and comparable standard deviations in a region of long GRBs. For these last two fits, the dispersion of a corresponding peak of a two-Gaussian is greater than the dispersion of both the components in the three-Gaussian, hence it gives a hint toward the bimodality of the GRBs (Schilling et al 2002). This is in agreement with a very high probability that the third group in a three-component model is a statistical fluctuation.…”
Section: Standard Normal Distributionssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The fit for w = 0.26 does not fulfil this condition either, where the appropriate S (r) = 1.16 is taken from (Schilling et al 2002). The remaining three cases, although the shoulder is prominent, are also apparently bimodal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency distribution of foraging trip durations was bimodal, shown as two separate log-normal distributions of short and long trips (see later). The difference between the means of the distributions was greater than the sum of their standard deviations (Schilling et al 2002). The cut-off value separating short and long trips (6 h for experimental and 10 h for control birds) was obtained by calculating the minimal sum of the variances of both trip types given their log-normal distribution (Welcker et al 2009a).…”
Section: Foraging Effortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the analysis in [24], we can see that as long as the combined distribution for any two distributions is bimodal, Sd gain is able to separate the two distributions early in the tree construction process. Using two distributions of the same variance i.e.…”
Section: Detecting Clustered Anomalies Using Sd Gain Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using two distributions of the same variance i.e. σ 2 1 = σ 2 2 , with their respective means μ 1 and μ 2 , it is shown that the combined distribution can only be bimodal when |μ 2 − μ 1 | > 2σ [24]. In the case when σ 2 1 = σ 2 2 , the condition of bi-modality is |μ 2 − μ 1 | > S(r)(σ 1 + σ 2 ), where the ratio r = σ 2 1 /σ 2 2 and separation factor [24].…”
Section: Detecting Clustered Anomalies Using Sd Gain Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%