2019
DOI: 10.1177/0269215519829856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is interferential current effective in the management of pain, range of motion, and edema following total knee arthroplasty surgery? A randomized double-blind controlled trial

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of interferential current implementation following total knee arthroplasty surgery. Design: Double-blind randomized controlled study. Setting: Orthopedics and traumatology in-patient clinic. Participants: From an initial enrollment of 132 patients, 113 who met the study inclusion criteria were randomly separated into two groups: the interferential current group (n = 57) and the sham current group (n = 56). A total of 98 patients completed the study: 49 in the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interferential current is used for various purposes, such as improvement in intestinal transit [13], dysphagia [14], increase in vascular flow [15] and muscle strengthening [16], but its main use is to produce analgesia [17]. However, there are conflicting results about its use, as presented by Kadi et al [17] who used the interferential in the post-operative period of knee arthroplasty, which showed less use of paracetamol in only one of the evaluations, without advantages for other variables used in relation to pain. Similarly, Nazligul et al [18] did not observe any advantages in applying the interferential on a protocol with exercises, cryotherapy and non-hormonal anti-inflammatory in patients with impact syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interferential current is used for various purposes, such as improvement in intestinal transit [13], dysphagia [14], increase in vascular flow [15] and muscle strengthening [16], but its main use is to produce analgesia [17]. However, there are conflicting results about its use, as presented by Kadi et al [17] who used the interferential in the post-operative period of knee arthroplasty, which showed less use of paracetamol in only one of the evaluations, without advantages for other variables used in relation to pain. Similarly, Nazligul et al [18] did not observe any advantages in applying the interferential on a protocol with exercises, cryotherapy and non-hormonal anti-inflammatory in patients with impact syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No positive IFC therapy results have been found for shoulder disorders [36,37]. Nevertheless, IFC therapy has shown analgesic effects for neck pain [38,39], low back pain [21,22,[40][41][42], knee osteoarthritis [26,27,[43][44][45] or postoperative knee pain [4,46]. Most of these studies have used the following parameters: carrier frequency of 4 kHz, AMF between 30-180 Hz, for 20-40 min with a strong but comfortable intensity.…”
Section: Randomized Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 21 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and 1 was a systematic review 32 (Supplemental Digital Content 2, Appendix 2, http://links.lww.com/AA/D848). The rest were RCTs describing nonpharmacologic interventions, 33,34 prospective nonrandomized designs, 35,36 or cohort studies. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Notably, 2 trials described uncommon perioperative medications.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Notably, 2 trials described uncommon perioperative medications. 31,44 While all included studies had a mean age over 65 years, 29 studies included subjects <65 years old, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][42][43][44][45] 3 studies included only geriatric patients, 28,37,41 and 1 publication did not clearly describe the age range for subjects. 23 As there is a paucity of data regarding analgesic management in elderly patients, we will summarize the identified literature by medication type, supplement findings when able with nongeriatric publications, and present both concerns and benefits these medications may offer.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation