1994
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810310204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is intravascular ultrasound better than quantitative coronary arteriography to assess cardiac allograft arteriopathy?

Abstract: Optimal methods to detect and quantify allograft arteriopathy have not been established. Both arteriography and intravascular ultrasound have been used to evaluate vessel lumen diameter and area and arterial wall thickness in patients following cardiac transplantation, although due to the anatomically diffuse nature of this disease, neither technique has been accepted as the diagnostic "gold standard". To determine the usefulness of quantitative angiography to detect transplant-related coronary artery disease … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also validated our QCA measurements to those obtained by IVUS and they were not statistically different. This is in agreement to the findings of Lowry et al (15).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also validated our QCA measurements to those obtained by IVUS and they were not statistically different. This is in agreement to the findings of Lowry et al (15).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…QCA has been found to be much more sensitive than conventional qualitative angiography in detecting CAV (13,14), and its results have been found to correlate closely with that of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), both for the early and late follow-up of transplanted patients (15). We thus used QCA to measure the mean lumen diameter loss (MLDL) as a marker of CAV.…”
Section: Quantitative Coronary Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The sensitivity of intravascular ultrasound in identifying early changes in the transplanted heart is well documented. 7,10 -13 The measurements derived from intravascular ultrasound images have been validated with morphometric 5,14 and angiographic [15][16][17] measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lovaly s výsledky intravaskulárního ultrazvuku v časném i pozdním období sledování příjemců štěpu [26]. Proto jsme k měření zúžení průměrného průsvitu jako markeru CAV používali QCA.…”
Section: Diskuseunclassified