2013
DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2013.780229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is intrinsic energy efficiency reflected in the pricing of office leases?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Europe, many studies have been developed in northern countries to verify the effect of EPC on market prices. Most of the studies were carried out in the Netherlands [7,8], United Kingdom (UK) [9][10][11], Austria [12], Ireland [12], Romania [13], Finland [14], Sweden [15,16], Norway [17], and Germany [18,19]. Whereas countries located in the Mediterranean area have been little studied in the academic literature [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, many studies have been developed in northern countries to verify the effect of EPC on market prices. Most of the studies were carried out in the Netherlands [7,8], United Kingdom (UK) [9][10][11], Austria [12], Ireland [12], Romania [13], Finland [14], Sweden [15,16], Norway [17], and Germany [18,19]. Whereas countries located in the Mediterranean area have been little studied in the academic literature [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between energy efficiency or green certification and higher rents is, however, taken for granted in the industry and evidenced as a 'willingness to pay' for a certified 'eco-label' (Fuerst & van de Wetering, 2015). Such forms of green certification have indeed been found globally to correlate with a (small) rental price premium (Fuerst & McAllister, 2011a;Wiley, Benefield, & Johnson, 2010) used to support this model (Axon et al, 2012;Fuerst, van de Wetering, & Wyatt, 2013). This willingness to pay is potentially self-fulfilling, with the most recent meta-analysis of US data (Fuerst, Gabrieli, & McAllister, 2017) finding that 'eco-investors' pay the most for environmentally certified properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Investment decisions and rental deals both constitute and reflect 'the market' created through the qualculative processes described above. Tracing the 'impact' of various green certifications, assessments and regulations as 'price signals' in a classical market is an established area of literature (Chegut et al, 2013;Fuerst & McAllister, 2011;Fuerst & van de Wetering, 2015;Fuerst et al, 2013Fuerst et al, , 2017, which fails to capture fully the recursive effects of their use, along with less formal 'standards', in the creation of a market itself through calculations and deals (MacKenzie et al, 2007). Seeing decisions to invest in energy-efficient buildings as being solely incentivized by their market value premium (De Jong & Parkinson, 2013) ignores: the powerful social processes shaping energy-related decisions which tend to lead development actors to make seemingly 'irrational' choices, building and buying energy-intensive offices beyond the 'needs' of actual occupiers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nase, Berry, and Adair (2013) argued that interior, exterior and urban-scale design could increase real estate values. Additionally, there are many articles, such as Wiley, Benefield, and Johnson (2010) and Fuerst, Wyatt, and van de Wetering (2013), that discuss the implications of energy efficiency investments and certificates on real estate values. All these articles focus on how PACs can impact DCF parameters (e.g.…”
Section: Current Focus Of Real Estate Investment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%