This article is, in essence, an extended review of Arlott, Swanton and the Soul of English Cricket, an affectionate biography of two English cricket journalists by the distinguished writers Stephen Fay and David Kynaston, published in 2018. Promotional material issued for the book and the many favourable reviews it received all attested both to the very different temperaments of the two men and to things which, purportedly, they had in common-namely, an opposition to racism and to commercialism in cricket. However, a re-examination of the (much chronicled) lives of the two men and of the times they lived through shows these judgments to be oversimplified and misleading. In particular, assumptions about racism (and, thus, anti-racism) in the book fail to take into account the transition in Britain society from a paternalist, imperialist racism to a racism based on the supposed incompatibility of cultures. The leading exponent of the latter racism was the Conservative MP and theorist Enoch Powell. The first part of the title of this article is taken from an essay by the Scottish political theorist Tom Nairn, whose book The Break-Up of Britain, first appeared in 1977, with a second edition in 1981 (Nairn 1981). Nairn uses it, in a chapter on the English nationalism of Enoch Powell, to describe the literary inclinations of English poets such as Powell's favourite, A.E. Housman. The other part of the title was prompted by the publication in 2018 of Arlott, Swanton and the Soul of English Cricket, an affectionate biography of two English cricket journalists by the distinguished writers Stephen Fay and David Kynaston (Fay and Kynaston 2018). The article responds to Fay and Kynaston's book in several ways and for several, connected, reasons. First, the book's subjects, John Arlott and E.W. 'Jim' Swanton were important interpreters of the game and feature prominently in the lore of the English cricket in the second half of the twentieth century. Second, a key theme of the book-racism and the opposition to it of the two men-is rendered in a way that allows very little context to the sentiments they were expressing. Third, this omission crucially entails ignoring political analyses of the English game-notably that of Mike Marqusee, whose book Anyone but England (Marqusee 1994), 1 as so often since its publication in 1994, is acknowledged (it's mentioned once by Fay and Kynaston) but the arguments it makes are ignored. Fourth, this obscures the transition in British society, and in the English cricket world, from one dominant set of racist assumptions (inherent