2013
DOI: 10.1093/ahr/118.3.653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Is It a Book That You Would Even Wish Your Wife or Your Servants to Read?” Obscenity Law and the Politics of Reading in Modern England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like D. H. Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover, the subject of an obscenity trial upon its mass publication in Britain in 1960, the car was apparently acceptable in the hands of a privileged and trustworthy few, but dangerous when opened up to the (young) masses. 137 Even so, the Earl's misgivings about the Mini were not entirely unfounded. The Mini's excellent road holding gave an enticing margin of error that was all too often used up, especially by adventurous young drivers.…”
Section: Class Gender and Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like D. H. Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover, the subject of an obscenity trial upon its mass publication in Britain in 1960, the car was apparently acceptable in the hands of a privileged and trustworthy few, but dangerous when opened up to the (young) masses. 137 Even so, the Earl's misgivings about the Mini were not entirely unfounded. The Mini's excellent road holding gave an enticing margin of error that was all too often used up, especially by adventurous young drivers.…”
Section: Class Gender and Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. As regards women and the lower orders Establishment attitudes at this time were probably never better encapsulated than by Mervyn Griffith-Jones QC (Eton and Cambridge) who, as prosecuting counsel in the obscenity trial of D.H. Lawrence's novel Lady Chatterley's Lover in 1960, asked the jury whether it was the sort of book 'you would wish your wife or servants to read' -see Hilliard (2013); subordination of women in the Conservative Party, another good index of Establishment opinion, was only now beginning to be challenged -see Campbell, 1987, 70-98; as to the prevailing Establishment view of 'coloured people' , this was seen in the dominant response of Establishment figures to the Notting Hill 'race' disturbances of 1958, for their part in which several white youths were given prison sentences. The reflection of Lord Pakenham (Eton and Oxford) on this incident in the House of Lords contained a blend, common at the time, of respect and condescension toward black people: 'I believe that our position in the matter was well expressed by Mr. Justice Salmon [Mill Hill and Cambridge] when passing sentence in one of these Notting Hill cases.…”
Section: Conclusion: Whither English Cricket?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Obscene Publications Act 1857 forbade the publication of obscene literature, as it was believed that the reading of such literature would encourage immoral behaviour among the more vulnerable readers of society, such as servants, women and children (cf. Hilliard, 2013;Marshik, 2006). The definition of "obscene" was officially formulated in the so-called Hicklin case in 1868, where the term was defined as any matter that might "deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences, and into whose hands" such matter will probably end up (Lehman, 2006, p. 169).…”
Section: Obscenity and Censorship In Britainmentioning
confidence: 99%