Is it the gums, teeth or the bite? Effectiveness of dimensions of enforcement in curbing corruption

Abstract

Adding a new dimension to determinants of corruption, this paper examines the effectiveness of enforcement in reducing corruption. We compare the influences of latent enforcement (police, judicial, and prosecutorial employment) versus actual enforcement (conviction rates) and enforcing institutions. Results based on data for more than 80 countries show that piecemeal enforcement to combat corruption by increasing enforcement employment is ineffective, rather comprehensive improvements in institutions by strengthening the rule of law or regulatory quality bear greater results. Thus, when it comes to corruption control, strong gums (institutions) are more effective than showing teeth (enforcement employment) or the bite (conviction rates). JEL-Codes: K420, F500.

Are health care scams infectious? Empirical evidence on contagion in health care fraud

“…8 Obviously, contagion effects cannot be considered for Alaska and Hawaii since they do not immediate U.S. neighbors. 9 However, the police may be one of several law enforcement bodies dealing with white-collar crime control (see Capasso, Goel, & Saunoris, 2019, for a related international study). To address this aspect, POLICE in Model 2.2 was replaced by the 2015 total FTE justice system employment (per capita) in a state (including police, judicial, and legal, and corrections employment; source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6727).…”

Do Economic Recovery Packages Open a Window of Opportunity for Corruption and Mismanagement? The Case of Italy in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic

“…As for enforcement, it is not possible to achieve high standards of accountability without controls that are essential to ensure the credibility of integrity frameworks (Capasso et al, 2019 ). Building on this specification, core components that contribute to the accountability of recovery measures were operationalized as shown in Table 2 that lists the indicators for transparency and enforcement safeguards.…”

Public Sector Strategies in Curbing Corruption: A Review of the Literature

“…Taking a similar perspective on enforcement, Capasso et al (2019) analyzed a dataset on 80 countries to assess the relative effectiveness of various types of law enforcement, judicial efficiency and broader measures of related institutional quality, demonstrating that strengthening country-level institutions is the most powerful deterrent to corruption. The main and most interesting implication from this study is that "comprehensive improvements in enforcement involving better institutions related to law and order are more effective in combating corruption than focus on individual dimensions of enforcement" (Capasso et al, 2019, p. 357), hence stressing once again the need for a holistic approach to fight against corruption.…”