2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1774-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it time to change the reference genome?

Abstract: The use of the human reference genome has shaped methods and data across modern genomics. This has offered many benefits while creating a few constraints. In the following opinion, we outline the history, properties, and pitfalls of the current human reference genome. In a few illustrative analyses, we focus on its use for variant-calling, highlighting its nearness to a ‘type specimen’. We suggest that switching to a consensus reference would offer important advantages over the continued use of the current ref… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
126
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because we compared graph-based mapping to the most-widely used linear mapping approach, we did not tune BWA mem. Our results show that a bovine breed-specific consensus sequence also improves linear mapping which corroborates recent findings in humans [5,27]. Because the adjusted consensus reference is also a linear sequence, tools that rely on a linear representation of the reference sequence can be used for read mapping and variant discovery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because we compared graph-based mapping to the most-widely used linear mapping approach, we did not tune BWA mem. Our results show that a bovine breed-specific consensus sequence also improves linear mapping which corroborates recent findings in humans [5,27]. Because the adjusted consensus reference is also a linear sequence, tools that rely on a linear representation of the reference sequence can be used for read mapping and variant discovery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous studies reported that linear mapping may be more accurate using population-specific than universal linear reference sequences [5,27,28]. In order to construct bovine linear consensus reference sequences, we replaced the alleles of the chromosome 25 ARS-UCD1.2 reference sequence with corresponding major alleles at 67,142 and 73,011 variants that were detected in 82 BSW and 288 cattle from four breeds, respectively.…”
Section: Linear Mapping Accuracy Using a Consensus Reference Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sampling of more individuals from multiple African populations can further reveal the genetic diversity in Africa and can thereby substantiate our understanding of allelic diversity in IG loci. The recent completion of the African reference genome (69) can put this divergence in a different perspective, particularly when compared with the more narrow diversity of the European reference genomes (71, 72).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographic and local population genetic stratification and variation complicate the ability to diagnose and treat medical conditions [32] (for additional exposition, see Addendum A.1). The predictive utility of GWAS and GWAS PRSs also varies broadly if the risk score is applied to a population other than the one for which the score was initially determined [33][34][35]. At the same time, there are many indications of the commonality of causal gene variants for polygenic diseases among geographically distinct populations [36,37], while admixed populations present an intermediate liability to diseases [38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%