2020
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.299.20777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it time to use nucleic acid amplification tests for identification of persons with sexually transmitted infections? evidence from seroprevalence and behavioral epidemiology risk surveys in men with chlamydia and gonorrhea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharyngeal or rectal swabs can also be considered depending on the case [45]. NAAT is extremely sensitive and specific for diagnosing the existence of Chlamydia trachomatis (sensitivity: 97.5-98.5 and specificity: 98.4-99.4) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (sensitivity: 98.0-98.5 and specificity: 99.6-99.8) [46].…”
Section: Protocol For Testing (A) Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (Naat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharyngeal or rectal swabs can also be considered depending on the case [45]. NAAT is extremely sensitive and specific for diagnosing the existence of Chlamydia trachomatis (sensitivity: 97.5-98.5 and specificity: 98.4-99.4) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (sensitivity: 98.0-98.5 and specificity: 99.6-99.8) [46].…”
Section: Protocol For Testing (A) Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (Naat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 A survey found that 81% to 98% of individuals with chlamydia and gonorrhea infections would be undiagnosed and untreated using only symptomology. 14 Case reporting of gonorrhea is largely based on laboratory diagnosis in China. Availability of laboratory tests may play a vital role in gonorrhea surveillance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%