PsycEXTRA Dataset 2010
DOI: 10.1037/e676422011-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is It You or Is It Me? Contrasting Effects of Ridicule Targeting Other People Versus the Self

Abstract: In this paper, we describe a program of research on the topic of ridicule, which explored the differing effects of observing either ridicule directed at other people or selfdisparaging ridicule. I n three studies, participants listened to humor that either ridiculed another person, ridiculed the self (the person expressing the humor), or involved no ridicule. Results in two studies showed that observing ridicule that targeted another person led participants to conform more to the alleged attitudes of others an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recurring self-deprecating statements might undermine a leader's sense of power and perceived confidence in the eyes of followers, or even be an indication of the leader's well-being ( Frewen et al, 2008). In addition, repeated self-deprecating statements may be perceived as insincere, as if they were being used in a manipulative way to elicit sympathetic responses ( Janes and Olson, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurring self-deprecating statements might undermine a leader's sense of power and perceived confidence in the eyes of followers, or even be an indication of the leader's well-being ( Frewen et al, 2008). In addition, repeated self-deprecating statements may be perceived as insincere, as if they were being used in a manipulative way to elicit sympathetic responses ( Janes and Olson, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is no single widely accepted definition of humor, for our purposes we define humor as any form of communication that is intended to elicit laughter (Martin 2007;Zillmann 1983). Though many types of humor have the potential to influence interpersonal outcomes (e. g. Martin and Kuiper 2007), the literature exploring humor in intergroup contexts has focused almost exclusively on humor that targets a person or persons based on their membership in a social group and, more specifically, disparagement humor, defined as humor that denigrates or maligns social groups (e. g. Cundall 2012;Martin 2007), whether playful or malicious (e. g. Janes and Olson 2010).…”
Section: Humor and Intergroup Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, individuals are also likely to target themselves adopting, thus, a SD humor style. SD humor occurs when individuals gently poke fun at their own faults and foibles and do not take themselves overly seriously (Martin et al, 2003;Janes and Olson, 2010), maintaining however their sense of self-acceptance (Vaillant, 1977). In some cases, existing literature confuses SD humor with self-defeating humor (Owens, 1994;Unal, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Review Sd Humormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lundy et al (1998) showed that males who used SD humor were rated as more desirable from females but only when individuals were perceived as physically attractive. Last, Janes and Olson (2010) indicated that the use of SD humor by professors may result in enhanced students' creativity. Generally, followers tend to attribute to leaders who make humorous comments about several traits of themselves.…”
Section: Literature Review Sd Humormentioning
confidence: 99%