Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs

Abstract

In recent years, as multinational corporation (MNC) subsidiaries have become more closely linked to international networks, their knowledge intensity has risen, and some of their R&D has gained a more creative role. Simultaneously, and often connectedly, many subsidiaries have acquired considerable strategic independence in all aspects of their operations, and therefore are able to exercise considerable intra-firm bargaining power to influence the distribution of the firm's resources. In this context, we suggest that intra-MNC knowledge flows are a key determinant of subsidiary bargaining power. We argue that subsidiary managers can exploit such power to pursue their own ends. Such rent-seeking behavior is implicit in much of the literature on managerialism, but our analysis suggests that such behavior can now occur in headquarters–subsidiary and subsidiary–subsidiary relations. Thus subsidiary strategic independence, designed to enhance the competitiveness of outputs (market knowledge) and inputs (asset-seeking and learning), can be corroded when the pursuit of subsidiary objectives encourages rent-seeking. Empirical analysis of a sample of high-technology subsidiaries in the UK provides strong support for the theory. We examine several avenues whereby the incentives of units within the MNC can be aligned. Journal of International Business Studies (2004) 35, 385–406. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400093

Global talent management and inpatriate social capital building: a status inconsistency perspective

“…We support Collings et al (2012) in that senior managers in subsidiaries should have more 'voice' in who gets sent to HQ. We also support the idea that subsidiaries should acquire strategic independence in aspects of their operations (Mudambi & Navarra, 2004); in particular they need to improve their bargaining power vis-à-vis the HQs in relationship to inpatriate assignments. Several organizations have been found to successfully permit their subsidiary more autonomy in the selection of global managers.…”

Knowledge transfer in product development: an analysis of Brazilian subsidiaries of multinational corporations

“…As noted by Oliveira, Boroni and Guevara (2009), strategic information exchange improves the standing of subsidiaries within the corporation, making them more relevant to headquarters. Mudambi and Navarra (2004) point out the increasing importance of subsidiaries in knowledge generation. Currently, a substantial portion of organizational knowledge is created by subsidiaries.…”

Transfer of Heterogeneous Knowledge Along the Dual-Network of MNCS

“…In addition, knowledge flows' route could provide evidence about the degree to which actors can legitimate their knowledge with regards to internal network actors of MNCs who are the receiver of the knowledge. MNCs' managers could also predict the bargaining power of their subsidiaries on resource allocation in the MNC by using knowledge flows' route because, as Mudambi and Navarra (2004) note, the pattern of knowledge flows indicates the current sources of value creation and future sources of value creation. In line with this, subsidiaries' value creation could be pursued on the prevalence of their knowledge within the MNC.…”