2013
DOI: 10.1177/0363546512473258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reliable in Predicting Clinical Outcome After Articular Cartilage Repair of the Knee?

Abstract: Strong evidence to determine whether morphological MRI is reliable in predicting clinical outcome after cartilage repair is lacking. Future research aiming specifically at clinical sensitivity of advanced morphological and biochemical MRI techniques after articular cartilage repair could be of great importance to the field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
132
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
11
132
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not perform MRI follow-up studies, as strong evidence is lacking to determine whether MRI is reliable in predicting clinical outcomes after cartilage repair. 29 There are limitations that need to be acknowledged and addressed regarding the present study. The first limitation concerns the heterogeneous patient population, which reflects the situation of patients with an indication for cartilage repair surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We did not perform MRI follow-up studies, as strong evidence is lacking to determine whether MRI is reliable in predicting clinical outcomes after cartilage repair. 29 There are limitations that need to be acknowledged and addressed regarding the present study. The first limitation concerns the heterogeneous patient population, which reflects the situation of patients with an indication for cartilage repair surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, MRI defect filling was more complete in the AMIC ® groups at two and five years. In this context, two recent meta-analyses of de Windt et al [27] and of Blackman et al [28] pointed out that conclusive evidence to determine whether morphological MRI is reliable in predicting clinical outcome after cartilage repair is lacking. These reports also stated that no MRI classification has been shown to correlate with clinical outcomes after different types of cartilage repair.…”
Section: Amicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reports also stated that no MRI classification has been shown to correlate with clinical outcomes after different types of cartilage repair, although AMIC was not among the procedures included in the studies [35,36]. Since the interpretation of cartilage structure from morphological MRI data is still debated and does not correlate with clinical scores, clinical and functional results should be considered as the most important outcomes, and so far, AMIC shows great clinical benefit for the patient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%