Is material deprivation decreasing in Germany? A trend analysis using PASS data from 2006 to 2013

Abstract

The analysis uses seven waves from the German Panel Study Labor Market and Social Security (PASS) covering the period from 2006 to 2013. During the observation period, Germany experienced a significant increase in average real incomes and employment, accompanied by a decrease of absolute income poverty as measured by the at-risk-of-poverty rate anchored at a fixed moment in time. PASS collects information on material deprivation with a list of 26 possessions and activities. The article discusses the difficulties of measuring material deprivation and identifies several sources of measurement error and selection bias. However, even when controlling for such errors and biases, regression models for different deprivation indices show a significant downward trend in material deprivation for the German resident population. Given the simultaneous decrease in absolute income poverty, it is concluded that measures of material deprivation behave like absolute income poverty indicators if the list of possessions and activities is not updated to changed living standard standards in society. A similar downward trend is observed also for individuals receiving basic income support. Moreover, supported individuals report deprivation differently depending on survey mode and number of previous panel interviews, raising the question of measurement equivalence in this subgroup.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12651-018-0244-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Change in maternal well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: Did pre-pandemic social support and parenting stress buffer or aggravate mental health disparities among lone and partnered mothers in Germany?

“…Note that we entered the logged equalized household income into the models because of its skewed distribution and to ease the interpretability of the coefficients. Lastly, mothers' level of perceived economic deprivation (Andreß, 2018) was assessed with three items asking mothers to indicate whether the following statements applied to their financial situation (1 = yes; 2 = no because of financial reasons; 3 = no because of other reasons): "We can put away money each month," "We can replace furniture," and "We can pay for unexpected expenses." Negative replies were collapsed into one category and a count of these answers was formed as a count indicator of perceived economic deprivation (1 = none; 2 = low, i.e., count of one; 3 = high, i.e., count of two or three).…”

Beyond Plastics-to-Plastics to Waste-to-Products: Opportunities for Closing the Carbon Cycle via Chemical Recycling

“…In enabling the recirculation of plastic waste as a valuable carbon feedstock alternative to fossil resources for new plastic production, mechanical recycling is seen as a key building block in the transformation of our linear economy towards circularity. However, as mechanical recycling reaches its limits in terms of the quantities of plastic waste that it could recycle 10, interest in chemical recycling (CR) is steadily increasing to complement mechanical recycling and increase circularity for plastics 11, 12.…”