Is Materialism All That Bad? Effects on Satisfaction with Material Life, Life Satisfaction, and Economic Motivation

Abstract

The literature in economic psychology and quality-of-life studies alludes to a negative relationship between materialism and life satisfaction. In contrast, the macroeconomic literature implies a positive relationship between material consumption and economic growth. That is, materialism may be both good and bad. We develop a model that reconciles these two contrasting viewpoints by asserting that materialism may lead to life dissatisfaction when materialistic people evaluate their standard of living using fantasy-based expectations (e. g., ideal expectations), which increases the likelihood that they would evaluate their standard of living negatively. In turn, dissatisfaction with standard of living increases the likelihood that they would evaluate their life negatively. However, materialistic people who evaluate their standard of living using reality-based expectations (e. g., ability expectations) are likely to feel more economically motivated than their non-materialistic counterparts, and this economic motivation is likely to contribute significantly and positively to life satisfaction. Survey data were collected from seven major cities each in a different country (Australia, Bosnia/Herzegovina, Germany, Egypt, Korea, Turkey, and the USA) using a probability sample (cluster sampling method involving income stratification). The results provide support for the model. The economic public policy implications concerning how people evaluate their standard of living using ability-based expectations are discussed in the context of the ideals of meritocracy. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

Does Consumption of Organic Foods Contribute to Korean Consumers’ Subjective Well-Being?

“…The factors can be categorized into genetic factors (e.g., genes, personality traits), circumstantial factors (e.g., income, marital status, employment), and positive behaviors and cognitions [31]. Although existing literature acknowledges positive behaviors as a factor that predicts well-being [31], excessive consumption behaviors can be harmful for well-being [32]. On a different note, Ganglmair-Wooliscroft and Wooliscroft [4] argued that well-being can be either outcomes of consumption or a determinant of consumption behaviors.…”

Indian consumers’ mall patronage intentions: impacts of shopping motivations, subjective norms, materialism, and self-efficacy

“…Indian consumers' growing prosperity can lead to an evaluation of living standards based on materialistic values. In other words, it can be inferred that people who frequently evaluate their standard of living positively based on their ability to get things done are likely to be motivated to perform that task (Sirgy et al, 2011). In this current study due to the increasing emphasis on materialism for the Indian consumers they are motivated to shop at the mall as it allows them to buy "products" that support their materialistic standard of living.…”

“…This finding indicates that materialism is a double-edged sword that can lead to life dissatisfaction based on ideal expectations or to satisfaction based on ability expectations (Sirgy et al, 2011). Happiness is considered an acquired attitude and a subcategory of materialism signaling that possessions are necessary for happiness (Workman & Lee, 2011).…”

Value Seekers, Big Spenders, Non-Spenders, and Experiencers: Consumption, Personality, and Well-Being

“…The Value Seeker aims to get the best of both worlds, the benefits of good financial management plus material comforts and conveniences. This is a realistic materialist, one whose material aspirations stay within financial limits, and thus renders materialism not "so bad" with respect to life satisfaction (Sirgy et al 2011). We see that of all the types, the Value Seeker excels in price knowledge and is a cooler sort of materialist who can wait for the right bargain and resist impulsive buying.…”