“…Note here that the literature in the field presents comparisons on the use of the optical and the UV lines, like Hβ and Mg II, as virial estimators of the M BH in AGN, pointing out that in some cases Mg II is more reliable as M BH estimator then Hβ (e.g., Marziani et al, 2013, and references therein). However, it has been shown that the Mg II wings are emitted from the weakly gravitationally bounded gas (see Kovačević-Dojčinović and Popović, 2015;Jonić et al, 2016), i.e., the assumption of virialization may be problem in using Mg II line as the BH mass estimator.…”