Is microaggression an oxymoron? A mixed methods study on attitudes toward racial microaggressions among United States university students

Abstract

To best understand the possible negative health and social consequences associated with racial microaggression, in-depth understanding of how people judge these events is needed. People of Color (POC) and White participants (N = 64) were recruited for a mixed-methods study that incorporated quantitative attitude ratings and focus group interviews. Participants read and discussed their attitudes toward five vignettes that reflected microassault, microinsult, and microinvalidation scenarios. Semantic differential ratings showed that participants judged microassaults to be most unacceptable, followed by microinsults and then microinvalidations. Using a grounded theory approach, our qualitative analysis of interview data revealed five thematic categories. First, participants judged receivers’ psychological harm to be a critical consideration for their attitudes toward microaggression scenarios; they discussed factors associated with individual differences in appraisals, prior exposures to discrimination, and sensitivity to race. Second, participants were less consistent in their opinion about the role of the deliverers’ intent on their judgment of microaggressions; many considered microaggression events to be results of deliverers’ cultural ignorance and racial insensitivity. Third, our analysis revealed the central importance of contexts that shaped participants’ attitudes toward microaggression. Fourth, participants also discussed the notion that receivers of microaggression were racist for calling attention to race issues. Finally, POC participants tended to relate to the vignettes and use their lived experiences to contextualize their opinions about racial microaggression. The current results raise concerns regarding the conceptualization and utility of the word “microaggression,” especially within the broader contexts of racism and major discrimination. Other empirical and practical implications are discussed.

How Does It Feel to Be Online? Psychotherapists’ Self-Perceptions in Telepsychotherapy Sessions During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy

“…The SD method operationalizes qualitative information, measuring respondents' affective, and attitudinal states based on the attributional meaning given to items (Osgood et al, 1957). The methodology is well established as a reliable and effective way to measure attitudes, preferences, and perceptions resulting from real-life experience (e.g., Hiessl and Skrandies, 2013;Lui et al, 2020;Paterlini et al, 2021;Sobolev et al, 2021). The research conducted by Osgood et al (1957), on different objects of investigation and among culturally different samples, showed that the SD method can highlight "latent cognitive structures" commonly referring to three different dimensions, mutually independent.…”

Microaggressions, Everyday Discrimination, Workplace Incivilities, and Other Subtle Slights at Work: A Meta-Synthesis

“…It has been suggested that its use to refer to experiences of different demographic groups from those about whom it was first explored has weakened its power and that “racial abuse” should be used instead, particularly for the experiences of Black people (Kendi, 2019). The affix of “aggression” within the term microaggression has been described as overly pejorative (Lilienfeld, 2017) and oxymoronic when combined with the root, “micro,” which suggests something trivial (Priscilla Lui et al, 2020). Ultimately, any term should achieve two things: give weight to people’s lived experiences and generate understanding in those who do not have that experience.…”

Advancing knowledge on the health consequences of discrimination: The potential of virtual reality.

“…Findings from qualitative and naturalistic survey research can inform the empirical questions that are addressed in VR studies and guide the design of VR simulations. In some of our own research, focus group participants deemed a set of written vignettes to be representative of real-life discrimination-related experiences, and we turned these scenarios into scripts and interactions within an immersive virtual environment (Lui, Berkley, et al, 2020; Lui, Pham, et al, 2020).…”