2019
DOI: 10.1177/0363546519845346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Microfracture Necessary? Acetabular Chondrolabral Debridement/Abrasion Demonstrates Similar Outcomes and Survival to Microfracture in Hip Arthroscopy: A Multicenter Analysis

Abstract: Background: Hip arthroscopy is becoming more advanced and commonly performed. However, significant controversy exists regarding whether high-grade acetabular cartilage lesions should be treated with debridement/abrasion or microfracture. In addition, patients treated with microfracture are subject to extended protected weightbearing rehabilitation to mitigate risk of subchondral plate fracture and to protect fibrocartilage tissue formation. Purpose: To determine the midterm patient-reported outcomes and failur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(76 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large effect sizes for patient-reported physical activity (where able to be calculated) were seen in all studies at latest follow-up for the HOS, HOOS, HAGOS and iHOT33 subscales, with the exception of ten study groups for the HOS [44, 80,85,97,98,138,142,144,146,147]; and one for HAGOS [17] in which effect sizes were moderate pre-to post-arthroscopy. In assessing progress between two post-arthroscopy time points, Kemp et al [89] determined a small effect size for the HOOS-SR.…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large effect sizes for patient-reported physical activity (where able to be calculated) were seen in all studies at latest follow-up for the HOS, HOOS, HAGOS and iHOT33 subscales, with the exception of ten study groups for the HOS [44, 80,85,97,98,138,142,144,146,147]; and one for HAGOS [17] in which effect sizes were moderate pre-to post-arthroscopy. In assessing progress between two post-arthroscopy time points, Kemp et al [89] determined a small effect size for the HOOS-SR.…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 Underpreparation leads to inadequate debridement of pathologic cartilage, which impairs collagen bonding and increases risk of delamination. 3 , 4 In contrast, overpreparation leads to violation of the subchondral plate and associated risk of subchondral fracture and intralesional osteophyte formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 A recent cohort study of patients undergoing debridement/abrasion of high-grade unipolar acetabular cartilage lesions demonstrated similar outcome scores and revision rates to those of patients undergoing microfracture. 11 Numerous studies have explored the possibility of augmentation of cartilage repair using different stem cells, growth factors, and scaffolds. One strategy is to modulate the chondral defect microenvironment to generate more hyaline-like cartilage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 A recent cohort study of patients undergoing debridement/abrasion of high-grade unipolar acetabular cartilage lesions demonstrated similar outcome scores and revision rates to those of patients undergoing microfracture. 11…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%