2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Microfracture of Chondral Defects in the Knee Associated With Different Results in Patients Aged 40 Years or Younger?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
267
2
13

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
11
267
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Access to the subchondral bone is established by multiple drill holes although these typically are deeper than the defects created by microfracturing [5]. Limitations of these techniques are poor repair tissue quality, ranging from hyaline to fibrous cartilage [33], and a decrease of clinical scores in patients who are 40 years old or younger at 18 to 36 months [18]. To overcome these limitations, advanced minimally invasive one-step techniques are needed that would enhance the patient-reported outcome scores and matrix components of the cartilage repair tissue [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to the subchondral bone is established by multiple drill holes although these typically are deeper than the defects created by microfracturing [5]. Limitations of these techniques are poor repair tissue quality, ranging from hyaline to fibrous cartilage [33], and a decrease of clinical scores in patients who are 40 years old or younger at 18 to 36 months [18]. To overcome these limitations, advanced minimally invasive one-step techniques are needed that would enhance the patient-reported outcome scores and matrix components of the cartilage repair tissue [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic reviews have shown a current clinical success percentage of 86%. The affect of patient and defectspecific prognostic factors such as lesion size [11,12], location [11,40], age [11,20,43], or body weight [12,18] is inconclusive owing to the absence of well-designed prospective studies [18,19]. The exact mechanisms of the healing process are unknown, which makes prediction of clinical outcome difficult [36,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteochondral autograft offers the benefits of mature hyaline cartilage transplantation, primary bone healing, and quick recovery and is recommended for high-demand athletes but is limited by donor graft morbidity [10,11]. Microfracture produces fibrocartilage and has inferior biomechanical properties [7,15,32,38], while autologous chondrocyte implantation produces a better hybrid of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage [7,32,38,51] but requires prolonged and complicated rehabilitation [34]. The use of scaffold alone offers a new strategy in the treatment of osteochondral injuries and diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%