2011
DOI: 10.1159/000331795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Minimally Invasive Retroperitoneal Pancreatic Necrosectomy Too Aggressive in Treating Infected Pancreatic Necrosis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endoscopic surgery is less aggressive compared to open surgery but it is much more aggressive a method compared to percutaneous or endoscopic catheter drainage using 8 or 10 F catheters under ultrasound or computed tomography control (general anaesthesia, progressive dilatation of drain tract to 30F allowing insertion of trocar, using grasping forceps for removal of necrotic tissue) [22,23]. Percutaneous catheter drainage seems technically feasible in the vast majority of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis [18,24].…”
Section: Percutaneous Drainagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic surgery is less aggressive compared to open surgery but it is much more aggressive a method compared to percutaneous or endoscopic catheter drainage using 8 or 10 F catheters under ultrasound or computed tomography control (general anaesthesia, progressive dilatation of drain tract to 30F allowing insertion of trocar, using grasping forceps for removal of necrotic tissue) [22,23]. Percutaneous catheter drainage seems technically feasible in the vast majority of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis [18,24].…”
Section: Percutaneous Drainagementioning
confidence: 99%