Is My Mobile Ringing? Evidence for Rapid Processing of a Personally Significant Sound in Humans

Abstract

Anecdotal reports and also empirical observations suggest a preferential processing of personally significant sounds. The utterance of one's own name, the ringing of one's own telephone, or the like appear to be especially effective for capturing attention. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the time course and functional neuroanatomy of the voluntary and the involuntary detection of personally significant sounds. To address this issue, we applied an active and a passive listening paradigm, in which male and female human participants were presented with the SMS ringtone of their own mobile and other's ringtones, respectively. Enhanced evoked oscillatory activity in the 35-75 Hz band for one's own ringtone shows that the brain distinguishes complex personally significant and nonsignificant sounds, starting as early as 40 ms after sound onset. While in animals it has been reported that the primary auditory cortex accounts for acoustic experience-based memory matching processes, results from the present study suggest that in humans these processes are not confined to sensory processing areas. In particular, we found a coactivation of left auditory areas and left frontal gyri during passive listening. Active listening evoked additional involvement of sensory processing areas in the right hemisphere. This supports the idea that top-down mechanisms affect stimulus representations even at the level of sensory cortices. Furthermore, active detection of sounds additionally activated the superior parietal lobe supporting the existence of a frontoparietal network of selective attention.

Gamma synchrony: Towards a translational biomarker for the treatment-resistant symptoms of schizophrenia

“…phase-locked) cortical GBRs reflect initial stages of sensory perception (Joliot et al, 1994; Singer, 1999). Relationships between gamma oscillations and other cognitive processes have been reported, including selective attention (Fries et al, 2001; Tiitinen et al, 1993), stimulus salience (Roye et al, 2010), associative and perceptual learning (Miltner et al, 1999), sensorimotor integration (Murthy and Fetz, 1992), and object representation (Tallon-Baudry and Bertrand, 1999). Such findings, observed across human and animal studies, demonstrate a phylogenetically conserved role for gamma synchrony in coordinating distinct aspects of sensory information among distributed brain regions.…”

Please silence your cell phone: Your ringtone captures other people′s attention

“…We wanted to test experimentally whether participants would be more disrupted by their own cell phone's ringtones than by someone else's ringtone. There is evidence from event-related potential studies that the brain's response to the own ringtone differs from the response to another ringtone [17,18] leaving open the opportunity that one's own ringtone has a higher disruptive potential on cognitive performance compared to that from another person, but it may also be the case that although the brain signals differ between these ringtone types, overt task performance does not.…”

The Rapid Extraction of Gist—Early Neural Correlates of High-level Visual Processing

“…Cortical oscillatory activity in the gamma-band frequency range is supposed to reflect the activation of distributed cortical stimulus representations (Fries, 2005;Engel & Singer, 2001). This activation can be influenced by the existence of stimulusspecific memory representations (Roye, Schröger, Jacobsen, & Gruber, 2010;Herrmann, Lenz, Junge, Busch, & Maess, 2004;Herrmann, Munk, & Engel, 2004). For example, the study by Herrmann, Lenz, et al (2004) demonstrated that real-world objects, which are represented in long-term memory, evoked a stronger eGBR at occipital electrodes than nonsense objects without a long-term memory representation.…”