2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-009-0606-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is my patient suffering clinically significant emotional distress? Demonstration of a probabilities approach to evaluating algorithms for screening for distress

Abstract: This study demonstrated the application of probability statistics to develop an algorithm for screening for distress in oncology patients. In our sample, a two-stage screening algorithm improved appreciably on the performance of the DT alone to identify distressed patients. Sequential administration of a very brief instrument followed by selective use of a longer inventory may save time and increase acceptability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would provide an additional assessment step preceding potential referral to a specialty psycho-oncology service. Staged approaches like this have been suggested previously [19,24].…”
Section: Implications For Changing the Pl Based On Cart Analysesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would provide an additional assessment step preceding potential referral to a specialty psycho-oncology service. Staged approaches like this have been suggested previously [19,24].…”
Section: Implications For Changing the Pl Based On Cart Analysesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Oncology and haematology outpatients completed the DT, PL and other measures on a touchscreen computer (QUICATOUCH) prior to their oncology appointment. Details of the QUICATOUCH assessment and scoring algorithms have been described previously [18][19][20].…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, screening is merely the first step in a comprehensive process; it needs to be accompanied by evidence-based action. Whilst the literature on cancer supportive care reports on many aspects of screening for unmet needs [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], the next stepaddressing these needs-is less frequently researched and reported [12][13][14][15]. In response to these issues, the researchers developed a Supportive Care Resource Kit [16] as a resource for clinicians to enable a systematic process of screening cancer patients for unmet supportive care needs and addressing these needs by using evidence-based protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinical setting, we have developed a two-stage computerised screening programme for pain, psychological distress and depression or anxiety in ambulatory oncology patients, and we sought to extend this computerised screening to the caregivers to include a measure of satisfaction with delivery of clinical care for the patient [8][9][10]. In order to do this, we required a validated instrument that was quick to use and therefore short in terms of number of items, available in the public domain and practical to use in the ambulatory care setting of a busy oncology out-patient clinic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%