2016
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.12689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Nickel Chloride really a Non‐Genotoxic Carcinogen?

Abstract: Human beings are exposed to carcinogens through air, water, food and tobacco smoke. Nickel chloride (NiCl ) is a toxic and carcinogenic environmental and occupational pollutant, which was previously classified as a non-genotoxic carcinogen and thought to not directly alter the DNA. Non-genotoxic carcinogens such as NiCl are difficult to detect in vitro; hence, a heavy reliance on animal studies exists. NiCl has previously been classified as a non-genotoxic carcinogen (NGTC); however, after studying the effect … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5 , 6 ), possibly linking to its shorter exposure duration (4 h). However, this also reflects some NGC trends, perhaps suggesting a ROS-centric mechanism (Stannard et al 2016 ). It was hypothesised that the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) may orchestrate cell morphology alterations (Fumarola et al 2005 ; Llanos et al 2016 ; Pincus and Theriot 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 , 6 ), possibly linking to its shorter exposure duration (4 h). However, this also reflects some NGC trends, perhaps suggesting a ROS-centric mechanism (Stannard et al 2016 ). It was hypothesised that the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) may orchestrate cell morphology alterations (Fumarola et al 2005 ; Llanos et al 2016 ; Pincus and Theriot 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…1 ) or in some other studies (Biggart and Costa 1986 ; Chakrabarti et al 2001 ). Therefore, NiCl 2 may not be a true NGC, as was previously believed, and its genotoxicity may be dependent on its exposure time (Stannard et al 2016 ). It is, therefore, apparent that different groups of carcinogens have a unique in vitro “fingerprint” or “signature” for carcinogenicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Some systems are more prone to ROS, which may lead to positive genotoxicity results. However, some systems have relatively high antioxidant capacity that can scavenge excessively produced ROS, and therefore attenuate the damaging effects of ROS (Stannard et al., 2017).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cependant, la génotoxicité des nanoparticules d'oxide de nickel (NiO-NPs), a été prouvée chez Allium cepa (Manna et Bandyopadhyay, 2017). Chez les mammifères, la génotoxicité de Ni a été aussi discutée par Stannard et al (2017) suite à la classification de NiCl2 en tant qu'un « carcinogène non-génotoxique », sans effets directs sur l'ADN et sur le nombre et la structure des chromosomes. Sa cancérogénicité a été, plutôt, attribuée aux espèces réactives de l'oxygène (ROS) produites sous ce stress métallique.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified