Is Occupation a Good Predictor of Self-Rated Health in China?

Abstract

BackgroundChina’s rapidly changing economic landscape has led to widening social inequalities. Occupational status in terms of occupational type and prestige may reflect these socio-structural shifts of social position and be more predictive of self-rated health status than income and education, which may only reflect more gradual acquisitions of social status over time. The goals of this study were to understand the role of occupational status in predicting self-rated health, which is well known to be associated with long-term mortality, as well as compare the occupational status to the other major socioeconomic indicators of income and education.MethodsData from the 2010 baseline surveys of the China Family Panel Studies, which utilized multi-stage probability sampling with implicit stratification was used. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship of various socioeconomic indicators (i.e. occupational status, income, and education) with self-rated health as the primary outcome of interest. A series of models considered the associations of occupational category or occupational prestige with self-rated health.ResultsThe final sample consisted of 14,367 employed adults aged 18–60, which was nationally representative of working adults in China. We found that occupation was not a major predictor of self-rated health in China when age, ethnicity, location, marital status, physical and mental health status were controlled for, with the exception of women working in lower grade management and professional jobs (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.03–3.22). In comparison, income followed by education exhibited greater association with self-rated health. The highest income group had the least probability to report poor health (In men: OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.21–0.43. In women: OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73). People educated with junior high school had better self-rated health than those with primary and below education level (In men: OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50–0.75. In women: OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.42–0.68). Income, education and occupation were correlated with each other.ConclusionsWithin the context of rapid societal changes in China, income and its implications for greater healthcare access and benefits had the greatest association with self-rated health followed by education. Occupational status was not associated. Occupational categories and prestige should be better adapted to reflect China’s unique sociopolitical and historical context.

Income, occupation and education: Are they related to smoking behaviors in China?

“…Occupation categories were coded from self-reported job descriptions. According to Erikson and Goldthorpe and Portocarero Class Categories, occupation was compressed to the following five categories for this study: managers and professionals, self-employed, agricultural workers, manual workers, and unemployed, with unemployed as the reference group [ 49 , 50 ].…”

Effect of socioeconomic status on the healthcare-seeking behavior of migrant workers in China

“…After referring to the Erikson and Goldthorpe and Portocarero occupational classification method, this paper divided occupations into four categories: manual workers, service personnel, self-employed workers, and professionals, taking manual workers as the reference group. This method of division is still widely used in China [35,36]. Finally, using principal component analysis, income, education, and occupation status were integrated into a composite variable of SES.…”

Occupational Prestige from the Nurses Point of View

“…Respect gained from occupational prestige represents a key pathway to one's success [5]. On the other hand, low occupational prestige has been associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, respiratory disease, cancer, and mortality [6,7].…”