1968
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90292-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is phloretin the sugar transport inhibitor in intestine?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phloretin was subsequently found to block sugar uptake in intestinal tissue [51], drawing significant interest to its application in the treatment of diabetes. Phloretin was shown to specifically inhibit GLUT2 and to a lesser extent SGLT1 [22,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phloretin was subsequently found to block sugar uptake in intestinal tissue [51], drawing significant interest to its application in the treatment of diabetes. Phloretin was shown to specifically inhibit GLUT2 and to a lesser extent SGLT1 [22,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stifling (1967) and Diedrich (1968) also estimated, again without correction for nonspecific binding, the number of transporters per cell of hamster intestine as 2.6 • 106 -4 x 108, while Wright and Peerce (1985) gave an estimate of 105-106 transporters per cell of rabbit intestine. From our data we estimate about 106-107 transporters per cell in mice on a high-carbohydrate diet, and about 1014-1015 transporters for the whole length of the mouse small intestine.…”
Section: The Positional Gradient Of Glucose Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethanol extracts of the tissue and also of the incubating solution were then analyzed by thin-layer chromatography with two systems: a nonpolar silica gel system whose solvent consisted of ethanol/chloroform/butanol (26 : 60 : 4 vol/ vol), and a polar cellulose system whose solvent consisted of ethanol/acetic acid/water (20 : 1 : 80 vol/vol; Diedrich, 1968). In the former, phloretin travelled close to the solvent front (Rf = 0.9) while phlorizin stayed close to the origin (Rf = 0.1); the second system effected the opposite migration pattern (Rf for phloretin -0.1, phlorizin -0.6).…”
Section: Thin-layer Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although equilibrium binding of phlorizin is rapid in whole tissue (Diedrich, 1968), the incubation should still be long enough to Fig. 1.…”
Section: Choice Of Incubation Timementioning
confidence: 99%