2011
DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Placebo Acupuncture What It Is Intended to Be?

Abstract: Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are recommended for evaluation of a treatment's efficacy with the goal of separating the specific effects (verum) from the non-specific ones (placebo). In order to be able to carry out placebo-controlled acupuncture trials, minimal/sham acupuncture procedures and a sham acupuncture needle has been used with the intention of being inert. However, clinical and experimental results suggest that sham/minimal acupuncture is not inert since it is reported that both veru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the seeds and semi-permanent needles, the group with needles, when compared to the control group without intervention, achieved statistically significant differences after Given the complexity of the subject, it is recommended that the effects evaluated of the sham acupuncture be compared with a standard treatment, also taking into account the possible individual responses (19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the seeds and semi-permanent needles, the group with needles, when compared to the control group without intervention, achieved statistically significant differences after Given the complexity of the subject, it is recommended that the effects evaluated of the sham acupuncture be compared with a standard treatment, also taking into account the possible individual responses (19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we did not use placebo or sham needles or minimal acupuncture, because studies suggest that that these are not inert treatments (8,22,23,28). Instead, our research question aimed to elucidate whether acupuncture is superior to the time and attention of meeting with the therapist.…”
Section: E940mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with 20 mmol/l citrate, pH 4.5; 12 rats were injected with streptozotocin as described above (STZ group); and 12 rats were injected with streptozotocin and treated twice a week with lowfrequency electroacupuncture (described below) for three consecutive weeks starting 1 week after diabetes induction (STZ+EA group). Control of electroacupuncture by minimal or superficial sensory stimulation (sham electroacupuncture) in diabetic rats was omitted since it does not represent an inert intervention, often producing significant responses comparable to those elicited by acupuncture itself [32]. Electoacupuncture in control rats was also omitted because of its demonstrated different effects in healthy and diseased persons [32].…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control of electroacupuncture by minimal or superficial sensory stimulation (sham electroacupuncture) in diabetic rats was omitted since it does not represent an inert intervention, often producing significant responses comparable to those elicited by acupuncture itself [32]. Electoacupuncture in control rats was also omitted because of its demonstrated different effects in healthy and diseased persons [32].…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%