2012
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/31644208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is pneumatization of middle turbinates compensatory or congenital?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pneumatization of the middle turbinate is augmented in the contralateral side as the airflow is markedly reduced in the nasal cavity due to the convexity of the deviation. (23) On contrary to the previous reports of extensive and bulbar type predominance, (8,16) this study found the lamellar variety in increased incidence in the population of southern Tamil Nadu.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pneumatization of the middle turbinate is augmented in the contralateral side as the airflow is markedly reduced in the nasal cavity due to the convexity of the deviation. (23) On contrary to the previous reports of extensive and bulbar type predominance, (8,16) this study found the lamellar variety in increased incidence in the population of southern Tamil Nadu.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…(8) Nasal septal deviation was claimed to occur due to CB, while contradicting claims stated that a prominent CB was found only on the contra lateral side of deviation or no association between them. (9,10,11) The existence of CB in sinusitis patients was noted in few studies but not statistically proven by them. (12,13,14,15) A lot of studies discussed the relation between extensive type CB,DNS and sinusitis, expect few (7,16,17) all described mainly extensive type of CB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTP, which is also referred to as bullous middle turbinate was firstly described as a transformation of the anterior part of the middle turbinate into a bubble, by Santorini [9]. This type of pneumatization is considered to represent a variation of ethmoid air cell development, not the outcome of an intranasal process [9,10]. According to the previous studies, the incidence of MTP ranges from 14 to 53%, and the incidence of bilateral MTP has been reported to be between 45 and 61.5% [11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Entre as variantes anatómicas que cursam com obstrução nasal, destacam-se as conchas bolhosas, que são pneumatizações dos cornetos nasais. [5][6] Consensualmente, considera-se uma concha bolhosa quando existe pneumatização de, pelo menos, 50% da altura do corneto médio, avaliada no plano coronal da tomografia computadorizada (TC). 7 No entanto, alguns autores consideram-na como qualquer grau de pneumatização 8 e outros apenas quando ambas as porções do corneto médio (lâmina vertical e porção bulbar) estão envolvidas.…”
Section: Palavras-chave: Obstrução Nasal; Cornetosunclassified
“…9 Envolve mais frequentemente os cornetos médios, seguidos pelos superiores e, em casos muito raros, pode atingir os inferiores. [5][6] A concha bolhosa apresenta uma prevalência nos indivíduos com sinusopatia avaliados por TC entre os 24,5 e 44%. [7][8][9][10][11] A existência deste intervalo de valores prendese com diferenças nas populações estudadas e nos diferentes critérios utilizados.…”
Section: Palavras-chave: Obstrução Nasal; Cornetosunclassified