2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-019-02014-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is population structure in the genetic biobank era irrelevant, a challenge, or an opportunity?

Abstract: Replicable genetic association signals have consistently been found through genome-wide association studies in recent years. The recent dramatic expansion of study sizes improves power of estimation of effect sizes, genomic prediction, causal inference, and polygenic selection, but it simultaneously increases susceptibility of these methods to bias due to subtle population structure. Standard methods using genetic principal components to correct for structure might not always be appropriate and we use a simula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
106
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
2
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This resolution limit also confines the extent to which the confounding effects of population structure can be controlled in genomic studies of health and disease such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS). As these studies continue to seek ever-rarer genetic variation with ever-increasing cohort sizes, intricate understanding and fine control of population structure is becoming increasingly relevant, but increasingly challenging 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resolution limit also confines the extent to which the confounding effects of population structure can be controlled in genomic studies of health and disease such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS). As these studies continue to seek ever-rarer genetic variation with ever-increasing cohort sizes, intricate understanding and fine control of population structure is becoming increasingly relevant, but increasingly challenging 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects were observed with all spatially correlated environmental patterns, but were particularly pronounced if environmental effects are concentrated in one region, as was also found by Mathieson and McVean (2012). Though increasing the number of PC axes used in the analysis may reduce the false-positive rate, this may also decrease the power of the test to detect truly causal alleles (Lawson et al . 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Alternatively, the findings may also reflect complexity introduced by the scale and sampling frame of UK Biobank. Although the LCV model is more robust than MR to biasing effects from sources such as horizontal pleiotropy and sample overlap, the LCV model can become biased by correlation between genetic variation and environmental factors which affect disease 17,35 . This aggregation might be due to factors such as ancient ancestry 36 , genetic nurture effects 37 or sampling phenomena 38 and is a concern in the UK Biobank sample 39 where much of the data used in this experiment were obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%