2019
DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhz007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Predicted Data a Viable Alternative to Real Data?

Abstract: It is costly to collect the household- and individual-level data that underlie official estimates of poverty and health. For this reason, developing countries often do not have the budget to update estimates of poverty and health regularly, even though these estimates are most needed there. One way to reduce the financial burden is to substitute some of the real data with predicted data by means of double sampling, where the expensive outcome variable is collected for a subsample and its predictors for all. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, information on travel times between households would be important to calibrate time savings, particularly in rural districts and island locations where shorter questionnaires may only yield negligible savings. Detailed cost estimation along the lines of Fujii and van der Weide [2020] on the cost-effectiveness of double sampling would be advisable if implementation were to be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, information on travel times between households would be important to calibrate time savings, particularly in rural districts and island locations where shorter questionnaires may only yield negligible savings. Detailed cost estimation along the lines of Fujii and van der Weide [2020] on the cost-effectiveness of double sampling would be advisable if implementation were to be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a large share of the data collection cost consists of visiting the household (transport and search costs), the marginal cost of asking a few additional questions once there, is very low. For a more detailed discussion of the trade‐offs between gains in precision and data collection costs, see for example Fujii and van der Weide ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a large share of the data collection cost consists of visiting the household (transport and search costs), the marginal cost to asking a few additional questions once there is very low. For a more detailed discussion of the trade-offs between gains in precision and data collection costs, see for example Fujii and van der Weide (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%