2008
DOI: 10.1080/02692170802407577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is public capital productive in Europe?

Abstract: This paper addresses the issue of whether and by how much public investment or public capital can increase GDP. In comparison with the literature on the subject, we apply many different methodologies to answer these questions. A vector autoregressive (VAR) model (for France, Italy, Germany, the UK and the USA), a panel composed of 6 European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands) and a regional panel (French regions) are estimated. Public investment is shown to be a significan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It provides linkages between imported technology and economic growth (Grossman and Helpman, 1991a, 1991b, 1995 and can be measured by estimating capital stock (Ka, 2009) which has been widely accepted as an economic growth prerequisite (Lewis, 1955;Nurkse, 1962). However, in terms of using a vector autoregression (VAR) framework to study the effect of public capital (public investment) on economic growth, the findings show mixed results (Creel and Poilon, 2008). Some studies find no relationship between the two (McMillin and Smyth, 1994;Otto and Voss, 1996); some find a positive relationship (Groote et al, 1999;Kamps, 2005;Ligthart, 2000); and some a negative relationship (Otto and Voss, 2002).…”
Section: Continued)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It provides linkages between imported technology and economic growth (Grossman and Helpman, 1991a, 1991b, 1995 and can be measured by estimating capital stock (Ka, 2009) which has been widely accepted as an economic growth prerequisite (Lewis, 1955;Nurkse, 1962). However, in terms of using a vector autoregression (VAR) framework to study the effect of public capital (public investment) on economic growth, the findings show mixed results (Creel and Poilon, 2008). Some studies find no relationship between the two (McMillin and Smyth, 1994;Otto and Voss, 1996); some find a positive relationship (Groote et al, 1999;Kamps, 2005;Ligthart, 2000); and some a negative relationship (Otto and Voss, 2002).…”
Section: Continued)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Typically, modeling of macroeconomic processes is done based on the classical production functions. This is evidenced by the models presented in textbooks, specialized studies devoted to consideration of methodological tools of formal long-term forecast, results of the analysis using models of production functions for the Russian economy, publications of foreign researchers (Baranov and Skufina, 2007;Chiang and Wainwright K., 2004, p.311-342;Creel and Poilon, 2008;Kirilyuk, 2013 andMcAdam andWillman A., 2013).…”
Section: Objectives Methodology and Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, productive public expenditures can be beneficial and sustain the economic growth, whereas to the contrary, unproductive public expenditures are mainly harmful. For example, Creel and Poilon (2008) Then, they show that public investments, and even public capital but to a lesser extent, are significant determinants of output. A 'golden rule of public finance', where government borrowing should not exceed public capital formation, could thus be beneficial.…”
Section: A Productivity Of Public Expenditures and Interest Rate On mentioning
confidence: 99%