2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-05876-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is rasterstereography a valid noninvasive method for the screening of juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is firm consistency with the results, especially concerning the spine, obtained via x-ray measurements which at this time are the “gold standard” ( D’Amico et al, 2017b ; Kinel et al, 2018 ). Other non-ionizing approaches, such as the rasterstereographic back-surface measurement technique or the recently introduced ultrasound measurement, were excluded because they raise concerns and questions that need further clarification about measurement accuracy and/or the need for the patient to keep a constrained position during the scanning measurement ( Kotwicki et al, 2007 ; Frerich et al, 2012 ; Takács et al, 2014 ; Bassani et al, 2019 ; Wanke-Jellinek et al, 2019 ; Wu et al, 2020 ). To note, new recently introduced optical method and software tool ( Ćuković et al, 2020 ) relying on the digitalized dorsal surface associated with a new 3D spine modeling ( Ćuković et al, 2015 ), multiscale and registerable 3D generic spinal model complemented by CAD technologies show a new, hopefully promising technique to improve rastereographic clinical reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is firm consistency with the results, especially concerning the spine, obtained via x-ray measurements which at this time are the “gold standard” ( D’Amico et al, 2017b ; Kinel et al, 2018 ). Other non-ionizing approaches, such as the rasterstereographic back-surface measurement technique or the recently introduced ultrasound measurement, were excluded because they raise concerns and questions that need further clarification about measurement accuracy and/or the need for the patient to keep a constrained position during the scanning measurement ( Kotwicki et al, 2007 ; Frerich et al, 2012 ; Takács et al, 2014 ; Bassani et al, 2019 ; Wanke-Jellinek et al, 2019 ; Wu et al, 2020 ). To note, new recently introduced optical method and software tool ( Ćuković et al, 2020 ) relying on the digitalized dorsal surface associated with a new 3D spine modeling ( Ćuković et al, 2015 ), multiscale and registerable 3D generic spinal model complemented by CAD technologies show a new, hopefully promising technique to improve rastereographic clinical reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This computational study was carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Fully anonymized biplanar radiographs acquired with the EOS Imaging System (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) were available for 192 subjects with age ranging from 10 to 18 years old from a previous clinical trial 17 which was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (protocol EOSCC2013) and during which subject assent and parental permission to use anonymized data in successive studies were given by signing an informed consent. Among those, the 64 subjects having Cobb angle in the coronal plane larger than 35° were included in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full-spine X-ray was rstly discarded due to his invasiveness as sustained by the articles on the matter [11][12][13][14][15]. The analysis of the literature, in particular [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], has therefore lead to choose as the postural analysis system for this study the DIERS Formetric 4D provided with the measuring protocol 4D Average able to perform a dynamic analysis capable to compensate for possible unintended movements of the subject, taking 12 pictures in 6 s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%