2019
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is self-care dialysis associated with social deprivation in a universal health care system? A cohort study with data from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network Registry

Abstract: Background Socioeconomic status is associated with dialysis modality in developed countries. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether social deprivation, estimated by the European Deprivation Index (EDI), was associated with self-care dialysis in France. Methods The EDI was calculated for patients who started dialysis in 2017. The event of interest was self-care dialysis 3 months after dialysis initiation [… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 The EDI allows for comparison between European countries, where it has been validated 25 and has already been used in the nephrology field. 19,26,27 There are factors associated with poverty that could affect PD utilization, such as patient education or access to the healthcare system, which could be modified. Haemoglobin level at dialysis initiation, a proxy of the predialysis care, and starting dialysis in an unplanned manner, which have been described as factors associated with a lower utilization of PD, may explain the association between social deprivation and PD uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 The EDI allows for comparison between European countries, where it has been validated 25 and has already been used in the nephrology field. 19,26,27 There are factors associated with poverty that could affect PD utilization, such as patient education or access to the healthcare system, which could be modified. Haemoglobin level at dialysis initiation, a proxy of the predialysis care, and starting dialysis in an unplanned manner, which have been described as factors associated with a lower utilization of PD, may explain the association between social deprivation and PD uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that SES was associated with dialysis modality in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and the United States. 10,[16][17][18][19][20] Whether social deprivation could act as a barrier to PD utilization is a matter of concern. Access to the healthcare system, education, and comorbidities linked to social deprivation may influence a lower rate of PD uptake in the most deprived individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 In three other studies also using EDI, social deprivation was associated with a lower peritoneal dialysis uptake 33 and with a decreased access to pre-emptive kidney transplant 34 , the most deprived adults were less likely to be on self-care dialysis. 35 One of our main findings is that children who were living in a more deprived area were more likely to initiate KRT with dialysis, with a clear social gradient. These results raise questions about the barriers leading to social inequality since pre-emptive kidney transplantation has been shown to improve kidney transplant outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“… 34 In 3 other studies also using EDI, social deprivation was associated with a lower PD uptake 35 and a decreased access to pre-emptive kidney transplant 36 ; the most deprived adults were less likely to be on self-care dialysis. 37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings were consistent with the results of previous studies, which highlighted social disparities in access to preemptive transplantation [9][10][11][12] and confirmed that the EDI can be used in the nephrology field of social deprivation. 12,[16][17][18]25,26 The factors that may explain this association could depend on the healthcare system, the recipient, and the donor, as well as the physician.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%