I t is widely accepted that, compared with dialysis, renal transplantation is associated with a lower risk of mortality and a greater quality of life. 1 Large-scale studies have demonstrated that patients transplanted before beginning dialysis had a lower risk of death than subjects who were transplanted while on dialysis. 2,3 Furthermore, it has been shown that the time spent on dialysis before transplantation affects patient survival. 3 The beneficial effect of preemptive transplantation on renal allograft survival is more controversial. 4 Nevertheless, longer transplant survival was found when transplantation was performed from a living donor 5-7 and when living-donor transplantation was performed preemptively rather than after the initiation of dialysis. 7 Recent recommendations encourage preemptive living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). 8 On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that there are social inequalities in access to preemptive renal transplantation. [9][10][11] In France, it has been suggested that social deprivation could influence access to preemptive registration. 12 There is a lack of data regarding the underlying mechanism by which social deprivation affects preemptive renal transplantation. Decreased access to living-donor transplantation of the most deprived population may partially explain this social inequity. 9,10,13 The European Deprivation Index (EDI) is a composite index that measures social deprivation. It contains variables common, on the one hand, to the European Union Statistics on Income and Living survey that studied objective poverty and the concept of individual perception of needs called "subjective poverty" in 26 European countries 14 and, on the other hand, Background. Social inequalities in health lead to an increased risk of chronic kidney disease and less access to renal transplantation. The objective of this study was to assess the association between social deprivation estimated by the fifth quintile of the European Deprivation Index (EDI) and preemptive kidney transplantation (PKT) and to explore the potential mediators of this association. Methods. This retrospective observational multicenter study included 8701 patients who received their first renal transplant in France between 2010 and 2014. Mediation analyses were performed to assess the direct and indirect effects of the EDI on PKT. Results. Among the 8701 transplant recipients, 32.4% belonged to the most deprived quintile of the EDI (quintile 5) and 16% received a PKT (performed either with a deceased-or living-donor). There was a significant association between quintile 5 of the EDI and PKT (total effect: odds ratio [OR]: 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.73]). Living-donor kidney transplantation was the main mediator of this association (natural indirect effect: OR: 0.92 [0.89-0.95]). To a lesser extent, positive cytomegalovirus and hepatitis C serologies and blood group B were also mediators (respective natural indirect effects: OR: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.95-1.00], OR: 0.99 [95% CI: 0.99-1.00], and ...