2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is sleeve gastrectomy still contraindicated for patients aged≥60 years? A case-matched study with 24 months of follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only statistical difference between the two groups was percent of excess weight loss (56.2% vs. 71.4%; P < 0.01). (20) In summary, this small comparative study did not see any obvious differences between younger patients and geriatric patients when looking at self-described factors contributing to their increased weight, and potential desired treatment options. When physicians are discussing weight loss options with the geriatric patient, they should keep in mind that elderly patients may wish to explore the same options as their younger cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only statistical difference between the two groups was percent of excess weight loss (56.2% vs. 71.4%; P < 0.01). (20) In summary, this small comparative study did not see any obvious differences between younger patients and geriatric patients when looking at self-described factors contributing to their increased weight, and potential desired treatment options. When physicians are discussing weight loss options with the geriatric patient, they should keep in mind that elderly patients may wish to explore the same options as their younger cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…When comparing improvements in metabolic and co‐morbid problems, the elderly did just as well as the younger patients at 24 months. The only statistical difference between the two groups was percent of excess weight loss (56.2% vs. 71.4%; P < 0.01) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten studies evaluated only the safety of bariatric surgery, and the remainder evaluated weight loss efficacy as well as safety, although the reported measures of efficacy and safety varied between studies. Thirty‐nine of the 66 included studies compared outcomes between older adults and a younger group, and in 12 of these studies, groups were matched for characteristics such as sex, BMI, and surgery type. The remaining studies reported results for older persons without a comparison group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Pequignot et al reported that there were no differences in operation time, length of stay, morbidity rate or mortality rate when they compared 42 patients aged >60 years and 84 patients aged <60 years who had undergone LSG. 15 Abbas et al also recently reported that both LSG and laparoscopic RYGBP could be safely and effectively carried out for patients aged >60 years. 16 In accordance with these reports, the present results show that LSG for patients aged >60 years is safe and of considerable benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) was evaluated in a simple sleep study that evaluated the number of sleep disruptions and the degree of oxygen desaturation. Apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was used to evaluate the severity of SAS (severe, >30; moderate, 15-30; and mild, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. ADL, activity of daily living; BMD, bone mineral density; BW, bodyweight; DL, dyslipidemia; DM, diabetes mellitus; EBW, excess body weight; HT, hypertension; NTX, type I collagen cross-linked Ntelopeptide; SMI, skeletal muscle index; TRACP-5b, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b.…”
Section: Figure S1mentioning
confidence: 99%