Is Social Contact With the Resident Population a Prerequisite of Well-Being and Place Attachment? The Case of Refugees in Rural Regions of Germany

Abstract

Due to dispersal policies applied in many European countries, such as Germany, rural regions are important arrival regions for asylum seekers and refugees. For German policy makers, who have faced a large number of immigrants since 2015, it is crucial that asylum seekers and refugees stay in those rural regions and benefit the development of those areas. This paper addresses the quality and quantity of social contact between refugees and resident populations as a prerequisite for integration and long-term migration-development effects from a social geographical perspective. Drawing from survey data and qualitative interviews, we examine expectations, perceptions and experiences of everyday encounters and social relationships in neighborhoods in small rural towns and villages from the perspective of both local residents and refugees. Our results support arguments from research literature for faster social inclusion in rural areas due to greater nearness, but also obstacles toward the integration of foreigners due to a higher homogeneity of rural neighborhoods and only few experiences of positive everyday contact with foreigners among rural residents. The interviewed refugees display a high level of reflexivity regarding their new neighborhood and how they might be seen by rural residents. Their experiences encompass various forms of social relationships, while social bridges are crucial, ranging from serendipitous encounters and functional interactions to connections based on mutual interest around family issues or cultural aspects. Openness and tolerance from at least some parts of the local population can help immigrants to feel at home, and support staying aspirations, while simultaneously evoking wider social change. A peculiarity of rural areas is the intersectionality with further challenges related to structural changes, encompassing, for instance, socio-demographic and economic restructuring. However, social interactions and opportunities for encounters are only one factor in the development of long-term settlement. More in-depth research is needed to consider the interrelations of both structural contexts and complex and changing needs for personal development in the future, also from an intergenerational perspective.

Choosing to Stay: Understanding Immigrant Retention in Four Non-metropolitan Counties in Southern Ontario

“…This literature considers what inspires people to identify with a place and consider it home (Le Tourneau, 2022 ). Some studies in this area focus on immigrants’ social relationships (Glorius et al, 2020 ). The connections that immigrants are able to develop in a place over time may significantly impact their attachment to a place and also their desire to stay in or move away from that place.…”

The Associations of Communal Space with Sense of Place and Mental Health in Public Housing: Evidence from Guangzhou and Hong Kong

“…As person–place transactions are closely linked with localities where cultural embeddedness is of great importance [ 38 , 59 , 60 ], we chose HK and Guangzhou as study locations that share a homogeneous cultural background to control for the impacts of cultural variation. Although public housing programme in HK and Guangzhou has been implemented within different social, economic and institutional environments, HK’s experiences were introduced to Guangzhou in the 1990s when housing reform and marketisation were underway.…”

Mass migration governance and openness toward refugees: Comparing Germany and Turkey

“…This study proposes that while increasing actual state capacity to manage mass migration is critical for migration governance, there is also the imperative to attend to public perceptions about states' capacity to manage policy challenges generated by refugee inflows. Studies that examine how social contact between refugee groups and local communities impacts public attitudes posit that facilitating the formation of social emotional bonds among groups may impact social cohesion processes positively (Glorius et al., 2020; Karakayalı, 2017). This study suggests that local communities regard the state and public authorities as the primary actors in refugee reception and integration in mass migration and understanding the role of the policy context and perceptions about state capacity matter for assessing the role of social interactions on social cohesion prospects.…”