2006
DOI: 10.1080/00016340600935722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low‐risk population?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
17
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of CL values obtained in our study was similar to the previously published reports [14][15][16][17][18] . Comparing the accuracy for prediction of early PTL, the 5 th centile of CL (< 26 mm) in our study and the 5 th centile of CL (< 22mm) in the study of Iams et al; our results showed better PPV (46.6% versus 26%) and better sensitivity (87.5% versus 30%) 15 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The distribution of CL values obtained in our study was similar to the previously published reports [14][15][16][17][18] . Comparing the accuracy for prediction of early PTL, the 5 th centile of CL (< 26 mm) in our study and the 5 th centile of CL (< 22mm) in the study of Iams et al; our results showed better PPV (46.6% versus 26%) and better sensitivity (87.5% versus 30%) 15 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…With significant difference found on conventional LR and LR weighted by prevalence calculation (35.1 and 2.7) we conclude that CL measurement has its place in the assessment of low risk pregnant women in population based PTL screening programs. This is already confirmed by some of our previously published reports 18,19 . Unfortunately, this significance is not so good in the assessment of low risk population for early PTL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1721,2327,30,61,62 Additionally, Moroz and Simhan 221 reported a significant association between cervical shortening and maternal systemic inflammation (determined by C-reactive protein; r 2 =.44, P =.001) in women with a sonographic short cervix (≤25 mm) diagnosed between 21 and 28 weeks of gestation. However, this association was not observed in patients without a short cervix.…”
Section: | Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…По мнению большинства ис-следователей [3][4][5], пальпаторная диагностика ИЦН яв-ляется субъективной и обладает высокой частотой ложно-положительных результатов -до 40%. В настоящее время влагалищное определение длины шейки матки сменяется ее измерением с помощью трансвагинальной эхографии [6]. Однако, по данным В.М.…”
unclassified