2007
DOI: 10.1108/00251740710819023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is South‐South trade the answer to alleviating poverty?

Abstract: PurposeSouth‐South trade is the fastest growing segment of world trade in the last two decades. This paper aims at demonstrating that it is a unique opportunity and a sound development tool for developing countries.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes the statistical and empirical evidence from a macroeconomic and microeconomic viewpoint, and discusses the policy options developing country governments face to promote South‐South trade and investment.FindingsNot all regions, countries, products and se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, it is commonly accepted that free trade leads to prosperity for the state. However, Agatielo (2007Agatielo ( : 1256 maintains that while no country has ever consolidated its socio-economic development by rejecting international trade and long-term capital inflows, no country has achieved it by opening up foreign trade and investment alone either.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, it is commonly accepted that free trade leads to prosperity for the state. However, Agatielo (2007Agatielo ( : 1256 maintains that while no country has ever consolidated its socio-economic development by rejecting international trade and long-term capital inflows, no country has achieved it by opening up foreign trade and investment alone either.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tupy (2005: 6-12) maintains, however: i) That liberalization in high-income countries would benefit the developing countries less than liberalization in developing countries; ii) That Sub-Saharan Africa is one of the world's most protectionist regions; iii) That the case against trade liberalization in Africa is made despite rapid economic growth experienced by relatively open African countries, such as Botswana and Mauritius; iv) That trade preferences particularly, "special and differential treatment", on their own do not help economic growth in SSA; v) That the disappointing export performance by many developing countries is as a result of domestic conditions, such as political instability and regulatory restrictions, for instance, lack of expansion preventing such countries from meeting export quotas, and inefficient production; and hence vi) That trade liberalization needs to be followed by domestic reforms, which are necessary to ensure that capital remains in SSA and is put to productive use. Agatielo (2007Agatielo ( : 1256 maintains that while no country has ever consolidated its socio-economic development by rejecting international trade and long-term capital inflows, no country has achieved it by opening up foreign trade and investment alone either. Panagariya (2003: 2) remarks that although trade openness is necessary for rapid growth, it is not sufficient by itself.…”
Section: Africa Free Trade and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expansion of South-South trade is the result of a convergence of factors, such as the economic growth of developing countries against a lower economic growth on the part of developed countries 7 -particularly China's growth that increased the demand for products and services from other developing countries, in addition to the average tariff reductions since the Uruguay Round, and the deepening and/or establishment of regional trade agreements (Agatiello, 2007;WTO, 2014). The 2008 global financial crisis also accentuated the upward trend in South-South trade, reinforcing these factors.…”
Section: South-south Trade In the G-77mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research emphasizes that trade has helped fight poverty, while depicting that countries have not all benefited equally (Agatiello, 2007), raising issues of inclusiveness and fairness. The gender gap is also suggested to indirectly hinder trade performance (Blowfield & Dolan, 2010;Thierry, 2007).…”
Section: Inclusive Trade Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%