CCR5del32 Homozygous deletion in the chemokine receptor R5 gene
provides almost complete protection to individuals against HIV infection.
However, data relating to the protective effect forCCR5del32
heterozygous individuals have been contradictory. The frequency of
theCCR5del32allele in population control cohorts was
compared with that of a group of children (27 Kalmyks and 50 Russians) infected
by G-subtype HIV-1 in a nosocomial outbreak. The frequency of
theCCR5del32allele was shown to be lower among the infected
children in comparison with that of the control group; however, the difference
was small and statistically insignificant. Similar results were obtained in a
number of earlier studies. The insignificance of the small differences could be
a result of one of two reasons. (i) The fact that there is no protective effect
of the heterozygous state, and that the phenomenon depends only on the
fluctuation of allele frequencies. In this case, there would be no differences
even if the infected cohort is enlarged. (ii)The protective effect of the
heterozygous state is real; however, the size of the studied cohort is
insufficient to demonstrate it. In order to discern between these two reasons, a
meta-analysis of data from 25 published articles (a total of 5,963 HIV-infected
individuals and 5,048 individuals in the control group, including the
authors’ own data) was undertaken. A conclusion was drawn from the
meta-analysis that theCCR5del32 allele protects individuals
against the HIV infection even in a heterozygous state
(OR=1.22, 95%CI=1.10–1.36). The risk of
HIV infection forCCR5 wt/del32 heterozygotes was lower by at
least 13% as compared to that for wild typeCCR5
wt/wthomozygotes. Prior to this study, no data of
the type or any conclusions had been published for Caucasians. The mortality
rate in the 15 years following the infection was found to be approximately 40%
lower forCCR5del32 heterozygotes in comparison with that for
the wild type homozygotes in the studied group. The size of the studied group
was insufficient to claim difference validity
(OR=2.0;p= 0.705), even though the effect
quantitatively matched the published data. The features of the meta-analysis
influencing the threshold level and the statistical validity of the effects are
being discussed. The level of theCCR5del32 protective effect on
the chances to be infected with HIV and on the outcome of the HIV infection was
assessed for various ethnic groups.