1998
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-55-7-1766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is spawner biomass a sensitive measure of the reproductive and recruitment potential of Northeast Arctic cod?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
182
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
182
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining variability may be due to a number of processes not included in the present exercise such as egg fertilisation (Vallin et al 1999) and the influence of parental characteristics (age and size structure, condition) on egg and larval characteristics (buoyancy, survival probability, e.g., Marshall et al 1998;Trippel 1998) and a potential starvation of larvae due to a shortage of suitable food supply (Grønkjaer and Wieland 1997) but also uncertainties in the way that variables are assumed to represent processes of interest (e.g., reproductive volume effect on egg survival, predation relative to predator-prey overlap). Results from recent studies on these topics are becoming available for Baltic cod (e.g., Nissling et al 1998) and potentially could also be incorporated into new generations of recruitment models (Vallin et al 1999).…”
Section: Applicability Of Stock-recruitment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining variability may be due to a number of processes not included in the present exercise such as egg fertilisation (Vallin et al 1999) and the influence of parental characteristics (age and size structure, condition) on egg and larval characteristics (buoyancy, survival probability, e.g., Marshall et al 1998;Trippel 1998) and a potential starvation of larvae due to a shortage of suitable food supply (Grønkjaer and Wieland 1997) but also uncertainties in the way that variables are assumed to represent processes of interest (e.g., reproductive volume effect on egg survival, predation relative to predator-prey overlap). Results from recent studies on these topics are becoming available for Baltic cod (e.g., Nissling et al 1998) and potentially could also be incorporated into new generations of recruitment models (Vallin et al 1999).…”
Section: Applicability Of Stock-recruitment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is now evident that variations in stock structure and condition of the adults can affect the level of egg production (Marshall et al 1998;Marteinsdottir and Thorarinsson 1998;Marshall and Frank 1999) and impact on egg viability and buoyancy. Variations in egg viability and buoyancy influence the survival probability of eggs and larvae (e.g., Kjesbu et al 1996;Nissling et al 1998;Trippel 1998) and, combined with variations in stock reproductive effort, are targeted as being responsible for recruitment fluctuations (Marshall et al 1998;Marteinsdottir and Thorarinsson 1998;Jarre-Teichmann et al 2000). Furthermore, the effects of predation on fish eggs and larvae (e.g., Bailey and Houde 1989) have the potential to reduce the reproductive success of a stock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, acoustic-survey estimates of abundance were used to quantify total egg production and TLE for NA cod (Marshall et al 1998. Here, only VPA estimates of the number at age (ages 3-15+; ICES 2000) were used so that abundance of spawners would be consistently scaled throughout the entire time series.…”
Section: Total Numbers Of Females By Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent research suggests that spawner biomass is a poor proxy for total egg production for NA cod (Marshall et al 1998 and possibly for other stocks (Lowerre-Barbieri et al 1998;Scott et al 1999;Kraus et al 2000). Furthermore, variables that could influence total egg production (e.g., age diversity of the stock, condition of spawners) have shown positive associations with recruitment (Boyd et al 1998;Marteinsdottir and Thorarinsson 1998;Marshall and Frank 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research indicates that maternal effects on egg survival are important (Kjesbu et al, 1991, Marshall et al, 1998. On the other hand, the results of Trippel and Neilsen (1992) and Trippel and Morgan (1994a, b) indicate that paternal effects play only a modest role in the spawning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%