2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is stimulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots a general phenomenon?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, levels of AM-induced plant secondary metabolites, such as cyclohexenone derivatives (Maier et al, 2000) and mycorradicin derivatives (also called yellow pigment; Klingner et al, 1995), which accumulate in mycorrhizal roots and are suggested to play a functional role in AM (Fester et al, 2002;Strack et al, 2003), were not affected by the increased invertase activity (Table I). In nonmycorrhizal plants these metabolites could not be detected (data not shown; see also Fester et al, 2002Fester et al, , 2005Schliemann et al, 2006). Induction of invertase activity starting at the beginning of fungal colonization (3 weeks after inoculation) also had no effect on the mycorrhization (Supplemental Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, levels of AM-induced plant secondary metabolites, such as cyclohexenone derivatives (Maier et al, 2000) and mycorradicin derivatives (also called yellow pigment; Klingner et al, 1995), which accumulate in mycorrhizal roots and are suggested to play a functional role in AM (Fester et al, 2002;Strack et al, 2003), were not affected by the increased invertase activity (Table I). In nonmycorrhizal plants these metabolites could not be detected (data not shown; see also Fester et al, 2002Fester et al, , 2005Schliemann et al, 2006). Induction of invertase activity starting at the beginning of fungal colonization (3 weeks after inoculation) also had no effect on the mycorrhization (Supplemental Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…AM symbiosis influences primary and secondary metabolism of host plants (Schliemann et al 2008): it induces important changes both in enzymatic activities (i.e. superoxide dismutase and catalase) (RuizLozano et al 1996;Marin et al 2002) and in physiological mechanisms leading to the accumulation of secondary metabolites, such as carotenoids and polyphenols (Walter et al 2000;Lambais et al 2003;Fester et al 2005;Marulanda et al 2007;Toussaint et al 2007). Some authors reported higher levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in colonized roots, and suggested that mycorrhizal plants respond to oxidative stresses by the accumulation of antioxidative enzymes and carotenoids (Fester and Hause 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expected that selection for higher levels of IG concentrations in P. lanceolata would result in suppression of AMF mutualism and reduced plant growth beneWt through toxicity of IGs in roots, or constraints in carbon allocation between defenses and the symbiont, or genetically correlated plant traits other than IG production with AMF suppressive eVects. Alternatively, it may well be that AMF stimulate and/or tolerate IG levels in roots, as suggested by the observed stimulation of other terpenoids in roots of cereals (Maier et al 1995) and legumes (Fester et al 2005) when colonized with AMF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%