Groin hernia is one of the most common surgical conditions worldwide with inguinal hernia repair being the most frequently undertaken operation in routine surgical practice. The lifetime 'risk' of inguinal hernia repair is high: 27 % for men and 3 % for women [1]. 10 % of groin hernia repairs are performed in emergency settings. Therefore, the appropriate diagnostics and due time treatment are important and should never be neglected.The diagnostic gold standard of groin hernia is clinical examination (CE). Nevertheless, as reported in literature, the sensitivity of CE when directly compared with ultrasound (US) in one group of patients was 80 % for CE versus 96.3 % for US [2]. Furthermore, our own study on a cohort of 2063 patients concerning the use of dynamic inguinal ultrasound (DIUS) of the groin showed that when performed well by the surgeon the specificity (0.9980) and sensitivity (0.9758) of DIUS were almost as high as of CT and MRI.The results were presented i.a. at 194. Wintertagung der Vereinigung Nordwestdeutscher Chirurgen, 2014 in Hamburg and will be published shortly in the literature [3].The European Hernia Society (EHS) guidelines state that inguinal hernias with clear clinical features do not require any further investigation. However in clinical occult groin hernia, ultrasonography is a useful non-invasive adjunct to physical examination [4].Interest must be focused on both, good diagnostic tools and the indications for treatment. After careful revision of the literature, we believe that proper diagnostics is a key element in developing good strategy for groin hernia treatment.Baukje van den Heuvel in her literature review on the appropriateness of an operational approach for an asymptomatic groin hernia came to the conclusion that watchful waiting was a safe and cost-effective modality in patients who were under 50 years, had an ASA class of 1 or 2, an inguinal hernia and duration of signs of more than 3 months [5].This further shows that to safely choose a wait-and-see approach, we should perform proper diagnostics to eliminate the mentioned risk factors, such as femoral hernia and initiating hernias. We cannot safely assume that ''If the pain is caused by a hernia in the early stage, the hernia will clearly manifest itself in very few weeks'' and that ''experienced surgeons, do not request complementary studies for hernia diagnosis'' as C. Brandi writes in his letter.Moreover, in our opinion, it is good that general practitioners and radiologists are referring patients to surgical specialists. It is our duty to make a complete diagnosis and instruct the patients about their treatment possibilities. To achieve that, we as surgeons should be able to perform DIUS as well as physical examination.In conclusion, it is very motivating that the diagnostics of groin hernia have been called into question by many surgeons. In our practice we should follow guidelines, available literature and common sense; therefore, so-called ''easy-going'' inguinal hernias that can be diagnosed by clinical examination ...