1996
DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.4.2.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is task persistence related to smoking and substance abuse? The application of learned industriousness theory to addictive behaviors.

Abstract: R. Eisenberger's (1992) learned industriousness theory slates that individuals display differing degrees of persistence depending on their history of reinforcement for persistent, effortful behavior. These differences may influence the development, maintenance, and cessation of addictive behaviors. Individuals with low persistence may especially be attracted to the immediate reinforcement of drugs. Drug use may constitute further training in low persistence. These individuals may also fail to persist in behavi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
175
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
10
175
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the present study methodology cannot explicate the extent to which memory or recall biases play a role in such effects, future work could examine the significance of such symptoms prospectively during quit attempts. Some work suggests that hypervigilance to internal cues, emotional reactivity, and distress intolerance to early signs of withdrawal and other stressors each are related to duration of quit attempts (Brown, Lejuez, Kahler, & Strong, 2002;Quinn, Brandon & Copeland, 1996;Zvolensky, Feldner, Eifert, & Stewart, 2001). To the extent that such affective variables -hypervigilance, emotional reactivity, and distress intolerancecharacterize, at least in part, PD and PTSD, individuals with these disorders may be more apt to experience (perceived or objective) aversive symptoms, triggered by the cessation of smoking, to be problematic in efforts to abstain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the present study methodology cannot explicate the extent to which memory or recall biases play a role in such effects, future work could examine the significance of such symptoms prospectively during quit attempts. Some work suggests that hypervigilance to internal cues, emotional reactivity, and distress intolerance to early signs of withdrawal and other stressors each are related to duration of quit attempts (Brown, Lejuez, Kahler, & Strong, 2002;Quinn, Brandon & Copeland, 1996;Zvolensky, Feldner, Eifert, & Stewart, 2001). To the extent that such affective variables -hypervigilance, emotional reactivity, and distress intolerancecharacterize, at least in part, PD and PTSD, individuals with these disorders may be more apt to experience (perceived or objective) aversive symptoms, triggered by the cessation of smoking, to be problematic in efforts to abstain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the relationship found between low levels of distress tolerance and substance use in the Quinn et al (1996) study, Brown, Lejuez, Kahler, and Strong (2002) theorized that similar processes may be occurring in the context of a quit attempt. They hypothesized that smokers who are unable to succeed in a smoking cessation attempt would evidence lower levels of distress tolerance than those who succeed.…”
Section: Preliminary Studies On the Concept Of Distress Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the reinforcement for high effort should generalize across behaviors, leading to a greater probability of high effort in the future, and vice versa. Following from this theory, Quinn, Brandon, and Copeland (1996) assessed 52 heavy smokers and 57 nonsmokers on two behavioral persistence tasks. On the first task, the anagram persistence task (APT), subjects were presented with 21 anagrams on separate cards.…”
Section: Preliminary Studies On the Concept Of Distress Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measure is composed of two subscales: one which measures Positive Affect (5 items) (e.g., excited, interested, happy, energetic, and proud) and one that measures Negative Affect (5 items) (e.g., mad, frustrated, upset, embarrassed, nervous). All items are Quinn, Brandon, & Copeland, 1996).…”
Section: Figure 5 Computer Display Of the Birdmentioning
confidence: 99%