2016
DOI: 10.2308/accr-51408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Tax Avoidance Related to Firm Risk?

Abstract: We test whether tax avoidance strategies are associated with greater firm risk. We find that low tax rates tend to be more persistent than high tax rates and that measures of tax avoidance commonly used in the literature are generally not associated with either future tax rate volatility or future overall firm risk. Our evidence suggests that, on average, corporate tax avoidance is accomplished using strategies that are persistent and do not increase firm risk. We also find that the volatility of cash tax rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
383
7
17

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(447 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
40
383
7
17
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its high relevance gives rise to the assumption that complexity is not only driven by the complexity inherent in the regulations themselves, but also increasingly by the decision power of the tax authorities. This finding corresponds to the growing body of literature on tax risk Drake et al 2017;Guenther et al 2017;Nesbitt et al 2017) which examines the deviation of the final tax burden from the estimated tax burden. Such deviations can be caused, for example, by adjustments resulting from arbitrary decisions of tax officers in tax audits.…”
Section: Global Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, its high relevance gives rise to the assumption that complexity is not only driven by the complexity inherent in the regulations themselves, but also increasingly by the decision power of the tax authorities. This finding corresponds to the growing body of literature on tax risk Drake et al 2017;Guenther et al 2017;Nesbitt et al 2017) which examines the deviation of the final tax burden from the estimated tax burden. Such deviations can be caused, for example, by adjustments resulting from arbitrary decisions of tax officers in tax audits.…”
Section: Global Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…9 The last driver "unpredictability" has primarily been mentioned as another important complexity driver by the tax professionals we spoke to. While Slemrod (1989) and Cooper (1993) use the term "predictability" as a desirable feature of the tax system based on theoretical considerations, later (empirical) studies usually did not employ the reverse as a driver of complexity although "unpredictability" has received a lot of attention over the last years (Heimig 2014;Neuman 2016;Guenther, Matsunaga and Williams 2017;Feller, Huber and Schanz 2017;IMF and OECD 2017). Thus, it seems to be justified to include it as a complexity driver.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesquisas futuras podem tentar identificar as circunstâncias em que a Agressividade Tributária conduz a riscos adicionais. Desse modo podem fornecer informações sobre os fatores que deveriam influenciar as estratégias fiscais de uma empresa (Guenther et al, 2017). Qual a relação entre a Agressividade Tributária e a propensão a ser autuado por autoridade tributaria?…”
Section: Relação Entre O Risco Fiscal E a Agressividade Tributáriaunclassified
“…Existe, na atualidade, um crescente interesse nos temas associados à agressividade tributária e ao planejamento tributário, tendo a temática obtido ainda mais destaque nos últimos anos em face de uma combinação de fatores políticos, econômicos e tecnológicos, que têm impulsionado o foco do interesse público para as decisões corporativas, em especial aquelas relativas a tributação (Guenther, Matsunaga & Williams, 2017;Wilde & Wilson, 2017). Como reflexo desse crescente interesse, destaquem-se as novas regras do Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (Beps), estruturadas com o claro propósito de minimizar a possibilidade de planejamento tributário internacional para empresas multinacionais («BEPS Actions -OECD», 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…For example, the increase or decrease body of literature on di¤erent types of volatility. For recent studies that refer to tax volatility issue in accounting see, e.g., De Simone and Stomberg (2013), Jacob and Schütt (2013), McGuire, Neuman and Omer (2013) and Neuman, Omer and Schmidt (2016), Guenther, Matsunaga and Williams (2016). 13 For a comparison of dynamic programming and contingent claims analysis and the resulting tax e¤ects see Sureth (2004, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%