2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02719-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the 0.2%-Strain-Offset Approach Appropriate for Calculating the Yield Stress of Cortical Bone?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the recommendation of Zhang et al [45], we determined different yield strength values. This procedure was conducted in addition to the standard method, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the recommendation of Zhang et al [45], we determined different yield strength values. This procedure was conducted in addition to the standard method, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we evaluated an offset of 0.007% for the cortical, 0.05% for the trabecular, and 0.5% for the soft tissue specimens. The specimen-specific finite element optimization according to the approach by Zhang et al [45] is still pending. The resulting deviations from the ultimate level are shown in the Supporting Information S4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without validation, the 0.2% offset yield stress is widely used for many materials. However, in some cases, the yield stress derived from the strain offset of 0.2% is considerably higher than the experimentally measured value, especially for brittle materials [ 36 , 37 ]. Therefore, in this study, a strain offset of 0.1% was arbitrarily used to locate the yield point of the DNAN-based melt-cast explosives, and the yield point was defined as the intersection with a line parallel to the maximum slope but offset by 0.1%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small ligament fossa is in the middle of the large fossa, and the inside of the fossa has a river-like slip line. The standard to the edge of the fracture has a cut edge, elongated shallow fossa, cleavage planes [31], and torn edges. At room temperature, the fracture begins from the microporous aggregation type of the central part to the final cleavage fracture.…”
Section: Tc4 Titanium Alloy Fracture Morphology Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%