1990
DOI: 10.1207/s15566935eed0106_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Child Making Expected Progress? Measuring Change in Rate of Development With Young Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using SIB-R scores reported as standardized developmental age in years, results were calculated using the following formula: [Developmental Gain / Time in Intervention] / [Pretest Developmental Age / Pretest Chronological Age]. In cases in which a control group is not available, the PCI is preferable to a pretest–posttest comparison because it accounts for developmental gains that could be expected to occur without the intervention (Alquraini & Mahoney, 2015; Benner & Beckman, 1990). The minimum sample size for student participants was 40, seeking a change of at least 0.2 (a PCI of at least 1.2 minus the standard PCI of 1.0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using SIB-R scores reported as standardized developmental age in years, results were calculated using the following formula: [Developmental Gain / Time in Intervention] / [Pretest Developmental Age / Pretest Chronological Age]. In cases in which a control group is not available, the PCI is preferable to a pretest–posttest comparison because it accounts for developmental gains that could be expected to occur without the intervention (Alquraini & Mahoney, 2015; Benner & Beckman, 1990). The minimum sample size for student participants was 40, seeking a change of at least 0.2 (a PCI of at least 1.2 minus the standard PCI of 1.0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%