Is the Child Opportunity Index a Factor in Surgical Outcomes for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Abstract

Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been previously associated with delays in orthopaedic care. However, it is unclear how SES impacts patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), particularly regarding preoperative major coronal curve angle or surgical outcomes. Utilizing the Child Opportunity Index (COI)—an address-driven measure of pediatric education, health/environment, and SES—we investigated whether COI is associated with differences in preoperative scoliosis magnitude, age at surgery, and AIS surgical outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients with AIS surgically treated at a single center from 2011 to 2017 were reviewed. COI was calculated by inserting a patient’s home address into the nationally available COI database to derive a COI value. COI is scored from 0.0 to 100.0 (0.0 is lowest, 100.0 is highest). Specifically, COI is categorized as very low (<20.0), low (20 to 39.9), moderate (40 to 59.9), high (60 to 79.9), and very high (≥80). Those without addresses were excluded. Patients without proper radiographs to assess curve correction were also excluded. A COI threshold of 60.0 was used to separate patients into a low (<60.0) or high COI ( ) group based on published COI guidelines. Outcomes, including preoperative curve magnitude, age at surgery, percentage curve correction, operative time (OT), intraoperative estimated blood loss per level fused, length of stay, and complications, were compared across groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess correlations between COI and preoperative curve magnitude, as well as age. Results: Four hundred four patients were included in the study, and 263 had 2-year follow-up data. Patients were an average age of 14.9 years old (range: 11.2 to 19.8), had a median COI of 76 (range: 4 to 100), and had a mean preoperative major curve angle of 59 degrees (range: 36 to 93). COI was significantly higher for white patients compared with non-white (80.0 vs 40.0, P < 0.001), and higher for non-Hispanic individuals (79.0 vs 15.0, P < 0.001). Patients with Low COI were associated with a lower OT per level fused (P = 0.003) and decreased postoperative complication risk (P = 0.02). COI was not associated with preoperative major coronal curve angle, age at surgery, or any other surgical outcomes. Conclusion: COI was significantly lower for non-white patients and those of Hispanic ethnicity. Patients from low COI backgrounds achieved similar surgical results as those from high COI addresses and had a decreased OT per level fused and complication incidence, though the clinical significance of these differences is unknown. Future prospective studies are needed to determine whether these findings are reproducible across other states and health systems. Level of Evidence: Level III—prognostic study.