2018
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.25217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the choice of a standard zeroth‐order hamiltonian in CASPT2 ansatz optimal in calculations of excitation energies in protonated and unprotonated schiff bases of retinal?

Abstract: To account for systematic error of CASPT2 method empirical modification of the zeroth-order Hamiltonian with Ionization Potential-Electron Affinity (IPEA) shift was introduced. The optimized IPEA value (0.25 a.u.), called standard IPEA (S-IPEA), was recommended but due to its unsatisfactory performance in multiple metallic and organic compounds it has been questioned lately as a general parameter working properly for all molecules under CASPT2 study. As we are interested in Schiff bases of retinal, an importan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The so‐called ionization potential electron affinity (IPEA) shift, a single parameter whose numerical value (0.25 au) was selected from benchmark calculations, was supposed to be systematically used from then on . More recently, discussions about the use of IPEA, and its specific numerical value, have appeared in the literature, concerning organic systems in general, iron compounds, and free‐based and regular porphyrins in particular. In the present work, calculations with and without the use of the IPEA shift are compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so‐called ionization potential electron affinity (IPEA) shift, a single parameter whose numerical value (0.25 au) was selected from benchmark calculations, was supposed to be systematically used from then on . More recently, discussions about the use of IPEA, and its specific numerical value, have appeared in the literature, concerning organic systems in general, iron compounds, and free‐based and regular porphyrins in particular. In the present work, calculations with and without the use of the IPEA shift are compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%